Aging
Navigate
Research Paper|Volume 17, Issue 3|pp 630—642

Reproductive aging, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, and the diameter of blastocysts: does size matter?

Jakub Wyroba1,2, Joanna Kochan1,3, Maria Barszcz1, Grzegorz Mirocki1, Pawel Kordowitzki4,5,6
  • 1Malopolski Institute of Fertility Diagnostics and Treatment – KrakOvi, Krakow, Poland
  • 2Fertility Disorders Clinic, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
  • 3Department of Animal Reproduction, Anatomy and Genomics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland
  • 4Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • 5Department of Preclinical and Basic Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
  • 6Department of Gynecology Including Center of Oncological Surgery (CVK), Charité, Berlin, Germany
Received: September 19, 2024Accepted: February 24, 2025Published: March 5, 2025

Copyright: © 2025 Wyroba et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

There is no doubt that maternal aging, also known as reproductive aging, can contribute to the increased rates of aneuploidy observed in blastocysts generated from women of advanced age who undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF). Additionally, the hatching process of the blastocyst, which is crucial for successful implantation, may be impaired in aneuploid embryos. Aneuploid embryos often exhibit abnormal cell division and chromosomal distribution, which can lead to disruptions in the hatching process. Due to ethical restrictions, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is unavailable in all countries. Therefore, our retrospective study of 502 couples who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) aimed to elucidate if embryonic features, such as the ability to hatch and embryonic diameter, could be a reliable estimator for the success rate after embryo transfer, especially for women aged 26–45 years, and for IVF clinics which do not have access to PGT-A. The small hatching blastocysts (Bl. 5) group had a significant (p < 0.001) higher percentage of euploid embryos (≤35 Y- 73%, >35Y- 51%) compared to large (Bl. 4) counterparts (≤35 Y-58%, >35 Y- 38%). In patients aged 34-38 years, we detected 10% more euploid blastocysts in the hatching group than the expanding ones, which was a significant difference (p < 0.05). In conclusion, when selecting non-PGT-A tested embryos for embryo transfer (ET) or frozen embryo transfer (FET), a small hatching blastocyst seems to be a better choice than a large expanded one, especially for advanced-age patients for whom the risk of aneuploidy is higher.