Aging
Navigate
Research Paper|Volume 16, Issue 10|pp 8552—8571

Identification of a fatty acid metabolism-related gene signature to predict prognosis in stomach adenocarcinoma

Lei Liu1, Jing Sun2, Changqing Zhong1, Ang Zhang3, Guodong Wang1, Sheng Chen1, Shuai Zhang1, Min Wang1, Lianyong Li1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China
  • 2Department of Spinal Surgery, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China
  • 3Department of Hematopathology, Strategic Support Force Medical Center, Beijing 100101, China
* Equal contribution
Received: November 2, 2023Accepted: March 13, 2024Published: May 13, 2024

Copyright: © 2024 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Background: Fatty acid metabolism (FAM) contributes to tumorigenesis and tumor development, but the role of FAM in the progression of stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) has not been comprehensively clarified.

Methods: The expression data and clinical follow-up information were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). FAM pathway was analyzed by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA) methods. Univariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to select prognosis genes. Molecular subtypes were classified by consensus clustering analysis. Furthermore, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) analysis was employed to develop a risk model. ESTIMATE and tumour immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) algorithm were used to assess immunity. pRRophetic package was conducted to predict drug sensitivity.

Results: Based on 14 FAM related prognosis genes (FAMRG), 2 clusters were determined. Patients in C2 showed a worse overall survival (OS). Furthermore, a 7-FAMRG risk model was established as an independent predictor for STAD, with a higher riskscore indicating an unfavorable OS. High riskscore patients had higher TIDE score and these patients were more sensitive to anticancer drugs such as Bortezomib, Dasatinib and Pazopanib. A nomogram based on riskscore was an effective prediction tool applicable to clinical settings. The results from pan-cancer analysis supported a prominent application value of riskscore model in other cancer types.

Conclusion: The FAMRGs model established in this study could help predict STAD prognosis and offer new directions for future studies on dysfunctional FAM-induced damage and anti-tumor drugs in STAD disease.