Research Paper Volume 15, Issue 22 pp 13345—13367
Immune microenvironment heterogeneity reveals distinct subtypes in neuroblastoma: insights into prognosis and therapeutic targets
- 1 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Shenzhen Children’s Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China
- 2 Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, PR China
Received: July 11, 2023 Accepted: October 23, 2023 Published: November 27, 2023
https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.205246How to Cite
Copyright: © 2023 Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Background: Neuroblastoma (NB) is a childhood cancer originating from immature nerve cells in the sympathetic nervous system. Current clinical and molecular subtyping methods for NB have limitations in providing accurate prognostic information and guiding treatment decisions.
Results: To overcome these challenges, we explored the microenvironment of NB based on the knowledge-based functional gene expression signatures (Fges), which revealed heterogeneous subtypes. Consensus clustering of Fges activity scores identified three subtypes (Cluster 1, Cluster 2, and Cluster 3) that demonstrated significant differences in prognosis compared to mainstream subtypes. We assessed the immune infiltration, immunogenicity, CD8T cytotoxicity, and tumor purity of these subtypes, uncovering their distinct biological functions. Cluster 1 and Cluster 2 exhibited higher immunoreactivity, while Cluster 3 displayed higher tumor purity and poor prognosis. Gene ontology annotation and pathway analysis identified immune activation in Cluster 1, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in Cluster 2, and cell cycle processes in Cluster 3. Notably, the impact of EMT activity on prognosis may vary across NB subtypes. A classification model using XGBoost accurately predicted subtypes in independent NB cohorts, with significant prognostic differences. GPR125, CDK4, and GREB1 emerged as potential therapeutic targets in Cluster 3. CD4K inhibitors showed subtype-specific responses, suggesting tailored treatment strategies. Single-cell analysis highlighted unfavorable clinical features in Cluster 3, including high-risk classification and reduced cytotoxicity. Suppressed interactions between monocytes, macrophages, and regulatory T cells were observed, affecting immune regulation and patient prognosis.
Conclusion: To summarize, we have identified a new independent prognostic factor in NB that underscores the significant correlation between tumor phenotype and immune contexture. These findings deepen our understanding of NB subtypes and immune cell interactions, paving the way for more effective treatment approaches.