Introduction
Liver cancer is one of the most prevalent human malignancies, ranking third as a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. In 2020, 905,677 cases of liver cancer were diagnosed globally, with a mortality-to-incidence ratio of 0.6. The main reason for the high mortality rate is the lack of a satisfactory curative pharmacologic treatment. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), comprising 75–85% of cases, is the foremost type of liver cancer. HCC is characterized by active angiogenesis and metastasis, which account for its rapid recurrence and poor survival rates [2]. The need to identify novel biomarkers for diagnosing HCC and therapeutic targets for its treatment is therefore urgent. A number of signaling pathways essential for cell survival, metastasis, and DNA damage response are known to be dysregulated in HCC [3–6]. A better understanding of the regulatory mechanisms underlying HCC carcinogenesis will help in the development of novel molecular therapeutic targets. Deubiquitination (the removal of ubiquitin from proteins) regulates protein degradation by proteasomes and lysosomes. Deubiquitination is controlled by deubiquitinating enzymes that cleave the bonds between ubiquitin and its substrate protein. In humans, more than 100 deubiquitinating enzymes have been identified. Of the five established classes of these enzymes [7], a major one is the ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs). The functional diversity of these proteases is demonstrated in the profound effect they have on multiple biologic processes through the post-translational regulation of their interacting proteins. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated the importance of the USPs in carcinogenesis [8, 9]. Within this enzyme class, ubiquitin-specific protease 44 (USP44) has been found to be dysregulated in cancers such as colon cancer, leukemia, and glioma [10–12]. USP44, a gene located on human chromosome 12, consists of 712 amino acids. It has conserved cysteine, histidine, and aspartate residues, which are signature features of deubiquitinated enzymes, and through its unique ZnF-UBP structural domain, it participates in the regulation of protease activity [13]. A copy number meta-analysis of 12 human cancer types showed that USP44 is a novel tumor suppressor [14, 15]. USP44 has also been reported to be associated with breast cancer aggressiveness [16]. Currently, however, the abundance and functional role of USP44 in HCC remain unknown. In the present study, we conducted clinicopathologic analysis to investigate the prognostic value of USP44 in HCC. Furthermore, we used HepG2 cells to characterize USP44 gain-of-function in HCC. Finally, we performed a comparative transcriptomic analysis followed by a bioinformatic analysis, including Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, to understand the molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways underlying the roles of USP44 in HCC tumorigenesis. This report provides evidence that USP44 might be a novel therapeutic target in HCC.
Materials and Methods
Patient sample collection
Retrospectively collected clinical specimens were used in this study. Consent was obtained from all patients. The patients’ tumors were histologically confirmed as hepatocellular carcinoma. The data were collected from 2007–2008. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster approved the use of the clinical specimens for research. The data were extracted from the electronic patient record system under the IRB reference number (UW 05-359 T/1022). Tissue specimens for RNA extraction were immediately preserved in RNAlater (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and fixed in formalin for preparation of paraffin blocks. Clinical specimens were collected and processed by surgical tissue bank staff in the Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong. Patients undergoing tumor resection at Queen Mary Hospital were included. The clinicopathologic parameters required for this study were available from the surgical tissue bank.
cDNA synthesis and quantitative real-time PCR
RNA was isolated from 40 pairs of HCC and adjacent nontumoral liver tissues using TRIzol reagent (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA using the FastKing gDNA Dispelling RT SuperMix Kit (Tiangen). Expression levels of USP44 were determined using the SuperReal PreMix Plus (SYBR Green) kit for quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Emission intensity was detected using the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and following these steps: initial denaturation step at 95°C for 15 min, and 40 thermal cycling steps consisting of 10 s at 95°C, 20 s at 55°C, and 30 s at 72°C. Threshold cycles were averaged from triplicate reactions. To adjust for variations in the starting template, gene expression was normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. The mRNA expression of USP44 in HCC was compared with that in adjacent nontumoral liver tissue. The primer sequences were shown below (GAPDH_F: 5′-GAGAAGGCTGGGGCTCATTT-3′; GAPDH_R: 5′-AGTGATGGCATGGACTGTGG-3′; USP44_F: 5′-CCCTCAGACCAGAATGCTTTA-3′; USP44_R: 5′-CATTGCAGTGTACCCAGAACC-3′). For the transcriptome sequencing validation, the primer sequence of the select genes was shown below (CCND2_F: 5′-TTTGCCATGTACCCACCGTC-3′; CCND2_R: 5′-AGGGCATCACAAGTGAGCG-3′; CCNG2_F: 5′-CAGGATTGAGAAATGCCAAAGT-3′; CCNG2_R: 5′-TGACAGCCAGGACAAAAGTT-3′; SMC3_F: 5′-ATTGGTGCCAAAAAGGATCAGT-3′; SMC3_R: 5′-GATTGCTTCGAGAAAAACCAGC-3′; THBS1_F: 5′-GCTGGAAATGTGGTGCTTGTCC-3′; THBS1_R: 5′-CTCCATTGTGGTTGAAGCAGGC-3′; FZD2_F: 5′-GTGCCATCCTATCTCAGCTACA-3′; FZD2_R: 5′-CTGCATGTCTACCAAGTACGTG-3′; ROCK2_F: 5′-TGGTTTCTATGGGCGAGAATGT-3′; ROCK2_R: 5′-CAAGTCGTACCTCCCTATCTGTT-3′).
Cell culture
The HCC cell line HepG2 was cultured in minimal essential medium (Solarbio Science and Technology, Beijing, China) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution (Solarbio Science and Technology). Cells were grown in an air atmosphere with 5% (v/v) CO2 at 37°C.
Cell proliferation assays
Stably transfected HCC cells were seeded into a 96-well plate at a cell density of 4 × 103 cells per well, with four replicate wells. The cells were incubated for 1–6 days. After incubation, cell proliferation was measured using the CCK-8 assay (Data Inventory Biotechnology, Hong Kong). The colorimetric product formed was measured at an absorbance of 450 nm and 600 nm (optical density change: OD450 nm − OD600 nm).
Cell cycle analysis by propidium iodide
Stably transfected cells (8 × 105) were harvested when they reached approximately 80% confluence. The cells were trypsinized, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and fixed in 1 mL ice-cold 70% ethanol at 4°C overnight. The fixed cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1000 g for 5 min. The cells were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline and stained with 0.5 mL staining solution containing 50 μg/mL propidium iodide and 0.5 μg/mL RNase A for 30 min. The cells then underwent flow cytometric analysis using the FACSCanto and CellQuest software applications (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Average values of the G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases were obtained from at least three independent experiments.
Colony formation assay
Stably transfected HCC cells were seeded into 6-well plates (1000 cells/well). After incubation for 10 days, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, stained with 0.1% crystal violet stain solution for 30 min, and then destained with water. The colonies (>20 cells/colony) were counted and recorded.
Transcriptome sequencing and bioinformatic analysis
RNA quality and quantity were assessed using a Bioanalyzer 2100 and the RNA 6000 Nano LabChip Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and high-quality samples with an RNA integrity number >7.0 were used to construct the sequencing library. The cDNA library was ligated with indexed adapters, and the ligated products were amplified by PCR. The average insert size of the final cDNA library was approximately 300 bp. Next, 2 × 150 bp paired-end sequencing was performed on a NovaSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). High-quality clean reads were filtered using Cutadapt and the quality-trimmed sequence reads were mapped to the human genome reference (Homo sapiens Ensembl v96) using the HISAT2 software application (version: hisat2-2.0.4) [17]. The mapped reads of each sample were assembled using StringTie (version: stringtie-1.3.4d.Linux_x86_64) with default parameters [18]. StringTie and ballgown were used to estimate the expression levels of all transcripts and all genes. Genes with a |log2 (fold change: USP44/vector)| > 1 and log10 (q value) > 1.3 were considered to be differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The DEGs were subjected to gene ontology and pathway enrichment analysis using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery tool [19]. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was used to further understand the diseases, biologic functions, and gene networks controlled by USP44-mediated DEGs.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses of patient information, including age, sex, expression level of AFP, and the staging of HCC were performed using the Pearson chi-squared test. The positive of HBsAg in HCC, number of tumor nodules, degrees of differentiation, venous infiltration, and the presence of cirrhosis in HCC were performed using the Fisher's exact test. Size of largest tumor-length was assessed by the Student's t-test. The SPSS-PASW Statistics 18 software was used for statistical analyses. Correlations between clinicopathologic characteristics and USP44 expression levels were assessed by the Student’s t-test to establish differential gene expression in relation to specific tumor phenotypes. Quantitative data are reported as means with standard deviation or standard error of the mean. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used to compare USP44 expression levels between groups. Patient survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method from the date of surgery to the date of death or last follow-up. The log-rank test was used to compare survival between the groups. The Z-score is determined by using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. The DEGs of each treatment group were uploaded to the IPA system for functional analysis (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Canonical Pathway Analysis of IPA was used to identify significantly enriched canonical pathways in each treatment group, and Diseases and Functions Analysis of IPA was used to identify significantly enriched diseases and biological functions in each treatment group. The pathway or function with P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The activation z-score is to infer the activation states of predicted transcriptional regulators. The activation state of an upstream regulator is determined by the regulation direction associated with the relationship from the regulator to the gene.
Availability of data and materials
Transcriptome sequencing data from this study have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information BioProject database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject) with the accession code PRJNA791131.
Results
Low expression of USP44 is prognostic for HCC
We began by examining USP44 expression in human HCC by analyzing 40 HCC tumors (T) and paired adjacent nontumoral liver tissue (NT). The quantitative RT-PCR results demonstrated significant downregulation of USP44 in HCC tumors (57.5%) compared with adjacent nonmalignant liver tissue (p < 0.0001, Figure 1A), indicating that USP44 is commonly reduced in HCC. We next conducted a correlative analysis of the USP44 expression in HCC tumors and the clinicopathologic features of the patients. The results showed that expression of USP44 was lower in advanced-stage (stages IV) than in early-stage (stages II and III) HCC tumors (p = 0.049, Table 1), suggesting that USP44 expression is related to tumor staging. In addition, overall survival (p = 0.0471) and disease-free survival (p = 0.0189) were significantly poorer in the low USP44 expression group (median overall survival: 27.31 months; median disease-free survival: 3.98 months) than in the normal and high USP44 expression groups (median overall survival: 52.68 months; median disease-free survival: 28.2 months; Figure 1B). Taken together, our results indicate that low USP44 expression is a prognostic factor in HCC.

Table 1. Correlation between tumor USP44 expression and clinicopathologic features.
| Clinicopathological features | Frequency (%) | USP44 expression | P value* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mean ± SD/Number of cases | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Low | Normal and High | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Age (year) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| <59 | 18 (45.00%) | 10 | 8 | 0.822 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ≥59 | 22 (55.00%) | 13 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Male | 28 (70.00%) | 18 | 10 | 0.185 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Female | 12 (30.00%) | 5 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HBsAg | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Positive | 32 (80.00%) | 19 | 13 | 0.702 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Negative | 8 (20.00%) | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of tumor nodules** | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 23 (60.53%) | 11 | 12 | 0.182 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ≥2 | 15 (39.47%) | 11 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Differentiation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Well differentiated | 6 (15.00%) | 2 | 4 | 0.297 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Moderately differentiated | 23 (57.50%) | 14 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Poorly differentiated | 10 (25.00%) | 7 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Undifferentiated | 1(2.50%) | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Venous infiltration** | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Absence | 15 (39.47%) | 8 | 7 | 1.000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Presence | 23 (60.53%) | 13 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-tumor liver** | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chronic hepatitis | 7 (17.95%) | 4 | 3 | 0.248 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cirrhotic | 25 (64.10%) | 12 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-cirrhotic | 7 (17.95%) | 6 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TNM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| II and III | 21 (52.50%) | 9 | 12 | 0.049 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IV | 19 (47.50%) | 14 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AFP (ng/ml) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| <400 | 25 (62.50%) | 16 | 9 | 0.283 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ≥400 | 15 (37.50%) | 7 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Size of largest tumor-length (cm)** | 12.18 ± 4.53 | 9.09 ± 5.52 | 0.066 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *Pearson Chip-square or fisher’s exact test for number of cases, t-test for mean. **Total number less than 40 due to missing data. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overexpression of USP44 is associated with reduced proliferation in an HCC cell line
In a gain-of-function study, we used an HCC cell line model to determine the role of USP44 in the carcinogenicity of HCC. The HCC cell line HepG2 has relatively low USP44 mRNA expression as compared to other HCC cell lines including Hep3B, PLC-5, and MHCC97L (Figure 2A). Overexpression of USP44 in HepG2 cells was validated at the gene levels by quantitative RT-PCR (Figure 2B). We next investigated the functional role of USP44 in HCC. Our results showed that the overexpression of USP44 could significantly inhibit the growth of HCC cells (Figure 2C) and arrest the cell cycle at the G0/G1 phase (Figure 2D). In addition, USP44 overexpression reduced the ability of HCC cells to form colonies (Figure 2E). Collectively, these data suggest the importance of USP44 in HCC tumorigenicity.

Discussion
To date, few studies have investigated the correlation between USP44 and HCC. In the present study, we investigated the prognostic value of USP44 in HCC. By comparing USP44 expression levels in 40 pairs of HCC tumoral and nontumoral tissues, we found a significant reduction in USP44 expression in the tumoral tissues. More importantly, low USP44 expression was associated with advanced-stage HCC and poorer patient survival rates in HCC. This finding is similar to those described in previous reports about pancreatic and colorectal cancers, in which USP44 was found to be downregulated in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and colorectal cancer [20, 21], suggesting that USP44 is a prognostic marker in patients with cancer. Given that the role of USP44 in the carcinogenicity of HCC is still unknown, we used a gain-of-function analysis to characterize USP44 in HCC HepG2 cells. Our results demonstrated that USP44 overexpression reduced HCC proliferation by arresting the cell cycle at G0/G1. In addition, induction of USP44 inhibited the colony-forming ability of HCC cells. These results accord with many clinical studies showing that USP44 is a tumor suppressor that inhibits cancer-cell growth [15]. In vivo and in vitro studies have both shown that USP44 suppresses tumorigenesis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by regulating DNA damage repair [22]. USP44 was also reported to inhibit cell proliferation in colorectal cancer [21], clear cell renal cell carcinoma [23], and non–small cell lung cancer [24]. However, contradictory findings have been reported in gastric and prostate carcinomas, in which USP44 upregulation was associated with promotion of cancer progression and tumorigenesis, suggesting that USP44 has various roles in various cancer types [25, 26]. After functional characterization, we investigated the targets and cell signaling pathways regulated by USP44 in HCC. Using comparative transcriptomic analysis, we identified 292 USP44 targets. Gene ontology enrichment analysis and IPA further highlighted the involvement of USP44-mediated genes in cell proliferation. Overexpression of USP44 led to upregulation of CCND2 and CCNG2 and downregulation of SMC3, which are cell-cycle-related genes. Cyclin D2 (CCND2) is a core component of the machinery that drives cell cycle progression; it is associated with tumorigenesis [27]. However, the evidence about the function of CCND2 in tumorigenesis is contradictory, and some reports have suggested that CCND2 is an oncogene. For instance, an increase in CCND2 has been reported to promote cell growth in colorectal cancer [28]. A genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 study also demonstrated the importance of CCND2 in the proliferation and survival of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma cells [29]. However, a study looking at non–small cell lung cancer showed reduced expression of CCND2, and the level of CCND2 was adversely associated with recurrence-free survival in patients with non–small cell lung cancer [30]. In addition, the methylation rate of the CCND2 promoter was significantly higher in patients with HCC than in those without HCC. More importantly, advanced-stage HCC was associated with lower mRNA levels of CCND2 [31].
Unlike other cyclins, which positively regulate the cell cycle, cyclin G2 (CCNG2) regulates cell proliferation as a tumor suppressor gene [32]. CCNG2 is associated with various types of tumors and causes cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase. CCNG2 inhibits cell cycle progression in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and Raji lymphoma cells [33, 34]. Further, deletion of CCNG2 led to a decrease in cells in the G0/G1 phase in human colorectal cancer, and overexpression of CCNG2 prevented G1/S phase transformation in colorectal cancer cells [16]. Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein 3 (SMC3), a member of the chromosome structural maintenance family, helps to maintain chromosomal stability by forming heterodimers. SMC3 is highly expressed in HCC tissues and is positively correlated with poor prognosis in affected patients [35].
In the IPA, we found that USP44 controlled both frizzled family protein 2 (FZD2) and rho-associated protein kinase 2 (ROCK2), which are associated with the Wnt signaling pathway. The FZDs (including FZD1–FZD10) function as cell surface receptors in that pathway. Each member of the FZDs can activate Wnt signaling by interacting with various Wnt proteins [36]. Deletion of FZD2 inhibited the migration and invasiveness of HCC cells but did not affect HCC cell proliferation [37]. FZD2 overexpression was able to activate Wnt/non-canonical planar cell polarity in the HCC cell membrane signaling pathway to mediate HCC invasion and metastasis [38]. ROCK2 is a cytoskeletal regulator. It has been reported that ROCK2 mRNA and protein expression levels are significantly higher in HCC and that the ROCK2 rs9808232 polymorphism promoted its expression in liver tissue, thereby increasing susceptibility to, and poor prognosis in, HCC [39]. Thus, overexpression of USP44-reduced ROCK2 might reduce HCC tumorigenicity.
In the present report, we focused mainly on the role of USP44 in HCC cell proliferation through the regulation of gene transcription. However, the findings were mainly from one single cell line. Further study needed to be carried out to specify the function of USP44 by experiments knocking down/depletion of in Hep2G overexpressing USP44 to see whether it would increase malignant phenotype in the cells. In addition, further clinical studies are needed to confirm our findings. USP44 is a deubiquitinating enzyme that controls its targets post-transcriptionally through deubiquitination. Thus, further studies on the deubiquitination targets of USP44 could provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms controlled by USP44 in HCC. Moreover, USP44 has been reported to regulate various functions, such as metastasis and DNA damage response in other cancer types [23]. The latter functions could be one of the directions to pursue during further investigation of the role of USP44 in HCC. To summarize, our study has provided novel insights into the prognostic value of USP44 in HCC and provides evidence that USP44 could be a possible therapeutic target in HCC.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Huanhuan Zhou, Xing Zhang, Rong Li, Keng Po Lai, Nikki Pui-Yue Lee, William Ka Fai Tse: Conceptualization, Methodology. Huanhuan Zhou, Xiao Lin, Ting Fung Chan, Nikki Pui-Yue Lee: Software. Xiao Lin, Ting Fung Chan, Nikki Pui-Yue Lee: Data curation. Huanhuan Zhou, Lu Yang, Keng Po Lai, Rong Li: Writing- Original draft preparation. Huanhuan Zhou, Lu Yang: Visualization, Investigation. Rong Li, Keng Po Lai: Supervision. Huanhuan Zhou, Lu Yang: Validation. Keng Po Lai, Rong Li, Xing Zhang: Writing-Reviewing and Editing. All authors have reviewed and agreed to this information.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.
Ethical Statement and Consent
The Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong, Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster approved the use of the clinical specimens collected for the research. Consent was obtained from all patients.
Funding
This study is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (No. 2020GXNSFAA259044) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82060736).
Editorial Note
This corresponding author has a verified history of publications using a personal email address for correspondence.
References
- 1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71:209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 [PubMed]
- 2. Yang SF, Chang CW, Wei RJ, Shiue YL, Wang SN, Yeh YT. Involvement of DNA damage response pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:153867. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/153867 [PubMed]
- 3. Xie X, Hu H, Tong X, Li L, Liu X, Chen M, Yuan H, Xie X, Li Q, Zhang Y, Ouyang H, Wei M, Huang J, et al. The mTOR-S6K pathway links growth signalling to DNA damage response by targeting RNF168. Nat Cell Biol. 2018; 20:320–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-017-0033-8 [PubMed]
- 4. Wang M, Sun Y, Xu J, Lu J, Wang K, Yang DR, Yang G, Li G, Chang C. Preclinical studies using miR-32-5p to suppress clear cell renal cell carcinoma metastasis via altering the miR-32-5p/TR4/HGF/Met signaling. Int J Cancer. 2018; 143:100–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31289 [PubMed]
- 5. Li G, Liu D, Kimchi ET, Kaifi JT, Qi X, Manjunath Y, Liu X, Deering T, Avella DM, Fox T, Rockey DC, Schell TD, Kester M, Staveley-O'Carroll KF. Nanoliposome C6-Ceramide Increases the Anti-tumor Immune Response and Slows Growth of Liver Tumors in Mice. Gastroenterology. 2018; 154:1024–36.e9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.050 [PubMed]
- 6. Kauffmann A, Rosselli F, Lazar V, Winnepenninckx V, Mansuet-Lupo A, Dessen P, van den Oord JJ, Spatz A, Sarasin A. High expression of DNA repair pathways is associated with metastasis in melanoma patients. Oncogene. 2008; 27:565–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210700 [PubMed]
- 7. Hanpude P, Bhattacharya S, Dey AK, Maiti TK. Deubiquitinating enzymes in cellular signaling and disease regulation. IUBMB Life. 2015; 67:544–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.1402 [PubMed]
- 8. Agathanggelou A, Smith E, Davies NJ, Kwok M, Zlatanou A, Oldreive CE, Mao J, Da Costa D, Yadollahi S, Perry T, Kearns P, Skowronska A, Yates E, et al. USP7 inhibition alters homologous recombination repair and targets CLL cells independently of ATM/p53 functional status. Blood. 2017; 130:156–66. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-12-758219 [PubMed]
- 9. Hernández-Pérez S, Cabrera E, Salido E, Lim M, Reid L, Lakhani SR, Khanna KK, Saunus JM, Freire R. DUB3 and USP7 de-ubiquitinating enzymes control replication inhibitor Geminin: molecular characterization and associations with breast cancer. Oncogene. 2017; 36:4802–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.21 [PubMed]
- 10. Sloane MA, Wong JW, Perera D, Nunez AC, Pimanda JE, Hawkins NJ, Sieber OM, Bourke MJ, Hesson LB, Ward RL. Epigenetic inactivation of the candidate tumor suppressor USP44 is a frequent and early event in colorectal neoplasia. Epigenetics. 2014; 9:1092–100. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.29222 [PubMed]
- 11. Zhang Y, van Deursen J, Galardy PJ. Overexpression of ubiquitin specific protease 44 (USP44) induces chromosomal instability and is frequently observed in human T-cell leukemia. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e23389. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023389 [PubMed]
- 12. Zou Y, Qiu G, Jiang L, Cai Z, Sun W, Hu H, Lu C, Jin W, Hu G. Overexpression of ubiquitin specific proteases 44 promotes the malignancy of glioma by stabilizing tumor-promoter securin. Oncotarget. 2017; 8:58231–46. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16447 [PubMed]
- 13. Zhang W, Sulea T, Tao L, Cui Q, Purisima EO, Vongsamphanh R, Lachance P, Lytvyn V, Qi H, Li Y, Ménard R. Contribution of active site residues to substrate hydrolysis by USP2: insights into catalysis by ubiquitin specific proteases. Biochemistry. 2011; 50:4775–85. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi101958h [PubMed]
- 14. Cheng J, Demeulemeester J, Wedge DC, Vollan HKM, Pitt JJ, Russnes HG, Pandey BP, Nilsen G, Nord S, Bignell GR, White KP, Børresen-Dale AL, Campbell PJ, et al. Author Correction: Pan-cancer analysis of homozygous deletions in primary tumours uncovers rare tumour suppressors. Nat Commun. 2019; 10:525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08512-7 [PubMed]
- 15. Holland AJ, Cleveland DW. The deubiquitinase USP44 is a tumor suppressor that protects against chromosome missegregation. J Clin Invest. 2012; 122:4325–8. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI66420 [PubMed]
- 16. Liu T, Sun B, Zhao X, Li Y, Zhao X, Liu Y, Yao Z, Gu Q, Dong X, Shao B, Lin X, Liu F, An J. USP44+ Cancer Stem Cell Subclones Contribute to Breast Cancer Aggressiveness by Promoting Vasculogenic Mimicry. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015; 14:2121–31. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0114-T [PubMed]
- 17. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019; 37:907–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 [PubMed]
- 18. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc. 2016; 11:1650–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.095 [PubMed]
- 19. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn923 [PubMed]
- 20. Yang C, Zhu S, Yang H, Deng S, Fan P, Li M, Jin X. USP44 suppresses pancreatic cancer progression and overcomes gemcitabine resistance by deubiquitinating FBP1. Am J Cancer Res. 2019; 9:1722–33. [PubMed]
- 21. Huang T, Zhang Q, Ren W, Yan B, Yi L, Tang T, Lin H, Zhang Y. USP44 suppresses proliferation and enhances apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells by inactivating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway via Axin1 deubiquitination. Cell Biol Int. 2020; 44:1651–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.11358 [PubMed]
- 22. Chen Y, Zhao Y, Yang X, Ren X, Huang S, Gong S, Tan X, Li J, He S, Li Y, Hong X, Li Q, Ding C, et al. USP44 regulates irradiation-induced DNA double-strand break repair and suppresses tumorigenesis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2022; 13:501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28158-2 [PubMed]
- 23. Zhou J, Wang T, Qiu T, Chen Z, Ma X, Zhang L, Zou J. Ubiquitin-specific protease-44 inhibits the proliferation and migration of cells via inhibition of JNK pathway in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2020; 20:214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6713-y [PubMed]
- 24. Zhang YK, Tian WZ, Zhang RS, Zhang YJ, Ma HT. Ubiquitin-specific protease 44 inhibits cell growth by suppressing AKT signaling in non-small cell lung cancer. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019; 35:535–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.12096 [PubMed]
- 25. Xiang T, Jiang HS, Zhang BT, Liu G. CircFOXO3 functions as a molecular sponge for miR-143-3p to promote the progression of gastric carcinoma via upregulating USP44. Gene. 2020; 753:144798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.144798 [PubMed]
- 26. Park JM, Lee JE, Park CM, Kim JH. USP44 Promotes the Tumorigenesis of Prostate Cancer Cells through EZH2 Protein Stabilization. Mol Cells. 2019; 42:17–27. https://doi.org/10.14348/molcells.2018.0329 [PubMed]
- 27. Ding ZY, Li R, Zhang QJ, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Meng QY, Xi QL, Wu GH. Prognostic role of cyclin D2/D3 in multiple human malignant neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2019; 8:2717–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2152 [PubMed]
- 28. Zhang W, Wang B, Lin Y, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Wang Q, Zhang H, Jiang K, Ye Y, Wang S, Shen Z. hsa_circ_0000231 Promotes colorectal cancer cell growth through upregulation of CCND2 by IGF2BP3/miR-375 dual pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2022; 22:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-022-02455-8 [PubMed]
- 29. Ishio T, Kumar S, Shimono J, Daenthanasanmak A, Dubois S, Lin Y, Bryant B, Petrus MN, Bachy E, Huang DW, Yang Y, Green PL, Hasegawa H, et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies CDK6 as a therapeutic target in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Blood. 2022; 139:1541–56. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021012734 [PubMed]
- 30. Ko E, Kim Y, Park SE, Cho EY, Han J, Shim YM, Park J, Kim DH. Reduced expression of cyclin D2 is associated with poor recurrence-free survival independent of cyclin D1 in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2012; 77:401–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.03.027 [PubMed]
- 31. Qian Y, Wang JW, Fang Y, Yuan XD, Fan YC, Gao S, Wang K. Measurement of Cyclin D2 (CCND2) Gene Promoter Methylation in Plasma and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Alpha-Fetoprotein Levels in Patients with Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Med Sci Monit. 2020; 26:e927444. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.927444 [PubMed]
- 32. Hasegawa S, Nagano H, Konno M, Eguchi H, Tomokuni A, Tomimaru Y, Wada H, Hama N, Kawamoto K, Kobayashi S, Marubashi S, Nishida N, Koseki J, et al. Cyclin G2: A novel independent prognostic marker in pancreatic cancer. Oncol Lett. 2015; 10:2986–90. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3667 [PubMed]
- 33. Huang Q, Shen YJ, Hsueh CY, Guo Y, Zhang YF, Li JY, Zhou L. miR-17-5p drives G2/M-phase accumulation by directly targeting CCNG2 and is related to recurrence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2021; 21:1074. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08812-6 [PubMed]
- 34. Zheng C, Xiao Y, Li Y, He D. Knockdown of long non-coding RNA PVT1 inhibits the proliferation of Raji cells through cell cycle regulation. Oncol Lett. 2019; 18:1225–34. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10450 [PubMed]
- 35. Nie H, Wang Y, Yang X, Liao Z, He X, Zhou J, Ou C. Clinical Significance and Integrative Analysis of the SMC Family in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:727965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.727965 [PubMed]
- 36. Zeng CM, Chen Z, Fu L. Frizzled Receptors as Potential Therapeutic Targets in Human Cancers. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19:1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051543 [PubMed]
- 37. Asano T, Yamada S, Fuchs BC, Takami H, Hayashi M, Sugimoto H, Fujii T, Tanabe KK, Kodera Y. Clinical implication of Frizzled 2 expression and its association with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2017; 50:1647–54. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.3937 [PubMed]
- 38. Liu Y, Deng H, Liang L, Zhang G, Xia J, Ding K, Tang N, Wang K. Depletion of VPS35 attenuates metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by restraining the Wnt/PCP signaling pathway. Genes Dis. 2020; 8:232–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2020.07.009 [PubMed]
- 39. Qin L, Liu X, Lan L, Lv X. ROCK2 Polymorphism and Expression Contribute to Increased Susceptibility and Poor Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Gen Med. 2022; 15:1295–306. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S343968 [PubMed]




