Aging
Navigate
Research Paper|Volume 12, Issue 11|pp 10497—10505

Both objective and paradoxical insomnia elicit a stress response involving mitokine production

Morena Martucci1, Maria Conte1,2, Rita Ostan1, Antonio Chiariello1, Filomena Miele3,4, Claudio Franceschi5, Stefano Salvioli1,2, Aurelia Santoro1, Federica Provini3,4
  • 1Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • 2Alma Mater Research Institute on Global Challenges and Climate Change (Alma Climate), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • 3IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • 4Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • 5Laboratory of Systems Medicine of Healthy Aging and Department of Applied Mathematics, Lobachevsky University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
* Senior co-authorship
Received: February 27, 2020Accepted: April 28, 2020Published: May 17, 2020

Copyright © 2020 Martucci et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Chronic insomnia is the most common sleep disorder in the elderly population. From 9 to 50% of patients suffer of paradoxical insomnia, with the same symptoms and ailments, though characterized by normal sleep patterns. We have investigated the level of parameters related to stress in a group of post-menopausal female patients (age range 55-70 years) suffering by either objective or paradoxical insomnia, in particular we have measured 24-hours urinary cortisol, allostatic load index, Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) score, and, for the first time, mitokines (mitochondrial stress response molecules) such as FGF21, GDF15 and Humanin (HN). Results show that the two groups are different as far as sleep efficiency score, as expected, but not for stress parameters, that in some cases resulted within the normality range, although quite close to the top threshold (such as cortisol) or much higher with respect to normality ranges (such as PSS). Therefore, the consequences of paradoxical insomnia on the expression of these parameters are the same as objective insomnia. As far as the level of mitokines, we showed that FGF21 and HN in particular resulted altered (decreased and increased, respectively) with respect to control population, however with no difference between the two groups of patients.