Aging
Navigate
Review|Volume 14, Issue 16|pp 6829—6839

New hallmarks of ageing: a 2022 Copenhagen ageing meeting summary

Tomas Schmauck-Medina1, Adrian Molière1, Sofie Lautrup1, Jianying Zhang1, Stefan Chlopicki2, Helena Borland Madsen3, Shuqin Cao1, Casper Soendenbroe4, Els Mansell5,6, Mark Bitsch Vestergaard7, Zhiquan Li3, Yosef Shiloh8, Patricia L. Opresko9,18, Jean-Marc Egly10,11, Thomas Kirkwood3,12, Eric Verdin13, Vilhelm A. Bohr3,14, Lynne S. Cox15, Tinna Stevnsner16, Lene Juel Rasmussen3, Evandro F. Fang1,17
  • 1Department of Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Oslo and Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog 1478, Norway
  • 2Jagiellonian Centre for Experimental Therapeutics (JCET), Jagiellonian University, Krakow 30-348, Poland
  • 3Center for Healthy Ageing, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2400, Denmark
  • 4Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital – Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen 2400, Denmark
  • 5Molecular Medicine and Gene Therapy, Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • 6Stem Cell Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
  • 7Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup 2600, Denmark
  • 8The David and Inez Myers Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Tel Aviv University School of Medicine P.O.B 39040, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • 9Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
  • 10Department of Functional Genomics and Cancer, IGBMC, CNRS/INSERM/University of Strasbourg, Equipe labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer, Strasbourg, France
  • 11College of Medicine, Center for Genomics and Precision Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan
  • 12UK National Innovation Centre for Ageing, The Catalyst, 3 Science Square, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5TG, UK
  • 13Buck Institute for Research on Ageing, Novato, CA 94945, USA
  • 14Section on DNA Repair, National Institute on Ageing, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
  • 15Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK
  • 16Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8000, Denmark
  • 17The Norwegian Centre on Healthy Ageing (NO-Age), Oslo, Norway
  • 18UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
* Equal contribution
Received: July 30, 2022Accepted: August 14, 2022Published: August 29, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Schmauck-Medina et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, mitochondrial dysfunction, loss of proteostasis, deregulated nutrient-sensing, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, and altered intercellular communication were the original nine hallmarks of ageing proposed by López-Otín and colleagues in 2013. The proposal of these hallmarks of ageing has been instrumental in guiding and pushing forward research on the biology of ageing. In the nearly past 10 years, our in-depth exploration on ageing research has enabled us to formulate new hallmarks of ageing which are compromised autophagy, microbiome disturbance, altered mechanical properties, splicing dysregulation, and inflammation, among other emerging ones. Amalgamation of the ‘old’ and ‘new’ hallmarks of ageing may provide a more comprehensive explanation of ageing and age-related diseases, shedding light on interventional and therapeutic studies to achieve healthy, happy, and productive lives in the elderly.