Aging
Navigate
Research Paper|Volume 13, Issue 15|pp 19722—19749

The role of age at menarche and age at menopause in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from a bidirectional mendelian randomization study

Mingli Li1,2,3,4,5, Jiali Lin1,2,3,4,5, Shuang Liang1,2,3,4,5, Zefeng Chen1,2,3,4,5, Yulan Bai1,2,3,4,5, Xinyang Long1,2,3,4,5, Shengzhu Huang1,2,3,4,5, Zengnan Mo1,2,3,4,6
  • 1Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
  • 2Guangxi Key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
  • 3Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
  • 4Guangxi Key Laboratory of Colleges and Universities, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
  • 5School of Public Health of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
  • 6Institute of Urology and Nephrology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, China
* Equal contribution
Received: December 27, 2020Accepted: May 31, 2021Published: August 4, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The association between endogenous estrogen exposure and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains inconclusive in previous observational studies, and few Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have focused on their causality thus far. We performed a bidirectional MR study to clarify the causality and causal direction of age at menarche and age at menopause, which are indicators of endogenous estrogen exposure, on AD risk. We obtained all genetic datasets for the MR analyses using publicly available summary statistics based on individuals of European ancestry from the IEU GWAS database. The MR analyses indicated no significant causal relationship between the genetically determined age at menarche (outlier-adjusted inverse variance weighted odds ratio [IVWOR] = 0.926; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.803-1.066) or age at menopause (outlier-adjusted IVWOR = 0.981; 95% CI, 0.941-1.022) and AD risk. Similarly, AD did not show any causal association with age at menarche or age at menopause. The sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. In contrast, an inverse association was detected between age at menarche and body mass index (BMI, outlier-adjusted IVW β = -0.043; 95% CI, -0.077 to -0.009). Our bidirectional MR study provides no evidence for a causal relationship between the genetically determined age at menarche or age at menopause and AD susceptibility, or vice versa. However, earlier menarche might be associated with higher adult BMI.