Research Paper Volume 12, Issue 11 pp 10633—10641
Gut microbiota–dependent Trimethylamine N-Oxide are related with hip fracture in postmenopausal women: a matched case-control study
- 1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
- 2 Institute of Traumatic Orthopedics, The 80th Army Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Weifang, Shandong Province, China
- 3 Department of Rheumatology, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical College, Weifang, Shandong Province, China
Received: September 27, 2019 Accepted: April 27, 2020 Published: June 1, 2020
https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103283How to Cite
Copyright © 2020 Liu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
The study evaluates the serum levels of Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO), a gut microbial metabolite, in 286 postmenopausal women with hip fracture. From January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018, eligible patients were included. Same women without fracture mated age were enrolled. TMAO serum levels were tested by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The serum levels of TMAO were significantly higher in patients with hip fracture than in those controls (P<0.001). The serum levels of TMAO were also higher in patients with hip fracture only than in those who also had upper limb fracture (P=0.001). High level of TMAO was proved a predictor of both hip fracture and had upper limb fracture combined hip fracture, after the adjustment of other existing risk factors [e.g., for each 1 uM increase of TMAO, odd ratio 1.16 (95% CI, 1.07–1.25), P < 0.001; and 1.12 (95% CI, 1.03–1.26), P=0.008, respectively]. In summary, increased TMAO serum levels associated with high risk of hip fracture, suggesting that increase TMAO may contribute to osteoporosis and fracture in postmenopausal women.
Introduction
The incidences of osteoporosis and fractures is rising rapidly due to the aging society in China [1]. Age is an independent risk factor for fracture and global aging brings urgency to fracture prevention [2]. Abnormal gut microbiota can affect the health of the elderly [3]. Previous studies showed that gut microbiota affected both digestive system and immune system, and associated with the osteoporosis and fractures [1]. The microbes are independent risk factors for obesity, diabetes, and osteoporosis [4].
Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), a circulating organic compound, derived from the metabolism of dietary L-carnitine and choline (metabolized by intestinal bacteria trimethylamine) [5]. Previous study had suggested that TMAO were associated with diabetes [6], metabolic syndrome [7], hypertension [8], stroke [9] and cardiovascular diseases [10].
Li et al. [11] reported that the rate of lose bone starting in midlife was ranged from 0.3% to 0.5% per year. The gut microbiota can affect bone density, bone remodeling and bone health [12–13]. However, the relationship between TMAO and fractures in Chinese patients has not been previously reviewed. We suspected that serum levels of TAMO were associated with osteoporosis. Furthermore, osteoporosis is the main cause of hip fractures [2]. Therefore, the study evaluates the serum levels of Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO), a gut microbial metabolite, in 286 postmenopausal women with hip fracture.
Results
Patient characteristics
From the initial 339 hip fracture postmenopausal women, 286 were included (53 patients were excluded: 28 with a major trauma or cancer; 5 with gastrointestinal diseases; 4 with infection and/or use of antibiotics; 6 with impaired hepatic/ renal function; 5 death and 5 referrals during research). The median age of those women was 65 (IQR, 57–75) years. 47.3% of the patients had associated comorbid illnesses, 15.4% had more than 1 comorbid illnesses, and the rest had a single comorbid illness. In addition, 11.5% (33/286) of the included patients had a family history of fragility fractures. Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the included women.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with hip fracture and controls†.
Parameters | Patients | Controls | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N | 286 | 286 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Age (years) | 65(57-75) | 65(57-75) | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Han, n (%) | 264(92.3) | 264(92.3) | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BMI(Kg/m2) | 26.2(23.9-28.6) | 25.9(23.7-27.9) | 0.92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drinking, n (%) | 31(10.8) | 27(9.4) | 0.58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Smoker, n (%) | 42(14.7) | 25(9.7) | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
History of falls during the last year | 1(1-2) | 0(0-1) | 0.009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hip fracture type, n (%) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Femoral head fracture | 134(46.9) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Femoral neck fracture | 113(39.5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtrochanteric | 39(13.6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concomitant upper-limb fractures, n (%) | 25(8.7) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distal radius (%) | 15(5.2) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proximal humerus (%) | 10(3.5) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total hip BMD(g/cm2) | 0.68(0.63-0.70) | 0.75(0.73-0.79) | <0.001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patients had associated comorbid illnesses, n (%) | 125(47.3) | 115(40.2) | 0.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diabetes | 35(12.2) | 27(9.4) | 0.28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hypertension | 59(20.6) | 50(17.5) | 0.34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cardiovascular disease | 42(14.7) | 25(8.7) | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hyperlipoproteinemia | 33(11.5) | 35(12.2) | 0.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time between fracture and blood collection(hs) | 22.5(15.0-28.5) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hospital stay(days) | 8(4-12) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Laboratory findings | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serum calcium (mmol/l) | 2.35(2.25-2.46) | 2.44(2.34-2.65) | 0.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serum ALP (IU/l) | 232(150-340) | 155(100-230) | <0.001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serum Hs-CRP (mg dL-1) | 0.35(0.24-0.45) | 0.28(0.18-0.37) | 0.007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serum TMAO (uM) | 5.8(3.4-8.8) | 4.3(2.6-6.4) | <0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
†Results are expressed as N(percentages) or as medians (IQR). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NS, no significant; BMI, body mass index; Hs-CRP, High-sensitivity- C-reactive protein (BMI); ALP, alkaline phosphatase; TMAO, Trimethylamine-N-oxide; BMD, bone mineral density. |
Main results
The median serum levels of TMAO in hip fracture patients was 5.8(IQR, 3.4-8.8) uM, which was significantly (P<0.001) higher than in those controls [4.3 (IQR, 2.6–6.4) uM], Figure 1. A negative correlation between TMAO and BMD (r=0.183, P=0.004) was found. The TMAO serum levels also related to high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (r=0.212, P<0.001) and Ca (r=0.186, P=0.003) in hip fracture patients. The serum levels of TAMO were associated with the number of falls in hip fracture patients (r=0.439, P<0.001) and in controls (r=0.338, P<0.001). No correlations were found between the serum levels of TMAO and the remaining binary variables (all, P>0.05).
TMAO and risk of hip fracture
The OR of TMAO levels compared with other risk factors was calculated by the logistic regression analysis. High level of TMAO was a predictor of hip fracture [e.g., for each 1 uM increase of TMAO, the unadjusted OR and adjusted OR were 1.25[95% CI: 1.15–1.34] and 1.16 [1.07–1.25], respectively. As shown in the Table 2, smoker, history of falls during the last year, cardiovascular disease, serum levels of calcium, ALP and Hs-CRP were also the fracture predictors.
Table 2. Multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis for hip fracture†.
Parameter | OR‡ | 95% CI | P | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Smoker (Yes vs. no) | 1.07 | 1.02-1.22 | 0.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
History of falls during the last year | 1.67 | 1.13-2.58 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cardiovascular disease (Yes vs. no) | 1.15 | 1.03-1.35 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serum calcium | 1.43 | 1.21-1.65 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serum ALP | 1.03 | 1.01-1.06 | 0.009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serum Hs-CRP | 1.11 | 1.04-1.22 | 0.006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Serum TMAO | 1.16 | 1.07-1.25 | <0.001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
†Multivariable model included all of the following variables: smoker, history of falls during the last year, cardiovascular disease, serum levels of calcium, ALP, hS-CRP and TMAO which had been confirmed in the univariable logistic regression analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
‡Note that the odds ratio corresponds to a unit increase in the explanatory variable. |
As shown in the Figure 2, the optimal cutoff level of serum TMAO was estimated to be 7.8uM, which yielded an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.60–0.69), and the sensitivity and specificity were 34.6% and 92.3%, respectively. Similarly, multivariable analysis models were used to assess adjusted OR and 95% CI of hip fracture for elevated TMAO (defined as TMAO≥cut-off value; with normal TMAO as reference). The results showed that elevated TMAO related to high risk of hip fracture (unadjusted OR 6.38, 95% CI: 3.84–10.59). In multivariable analysis, there was an increased risk of hip fracture in those patients with elevated TMAO (OR 3.68, 95% CI: 2.04–5.96; P<0.001) after adjusting for above confounders.
TMAO and risk of hip and upper limb fracture
Twenty-five patients had concomitant upper limb fracture. The median serum levels of TMAO in those patients was 8.6(IQR, 5.5-11.2) uM, which was significantly (P<0.001) higher than in those patients with hip fracture only [5.5 (IQR, 3.3–8.6) uM], Figure 3. The OR of TMAO levels compared with other risk factors was calculated by the logistic regression analysis. High level of TMAO was a predictor of hip and upper limb fracture [e.g., for each 1 uM increase of TMAO, the unadjusted OR and adjusted OR were 1.20[95% CI: 1.08–1.34] and 1.12 [1.03–1.26], respectively.
Figure 3. Distribution of serum levels of TMAO in postmenopausal women with hip fractures only and with hip combined upper limb fractures. All data are medians and inter-quartile ranges (IQR). P values refer to Mann-Whitney U tests for differences between groups. TMAO= Trimethylamine-N-oxide.
As shown in the Figure 4, the optimal cutoff level of serum TMAO was estimated to be 6.7uM, which yielded an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.60–0.80), and the sensitivity and specificity were 68.0% and 62.8%, respectively. Similarly, multivariable analysis models were also used to calculate adjusted OR and 95% CI of hip and upper limb fracture for elevated TMAO (defined as TMAO≥cut-off value; with normal TMAO as reference). The results showed that an increased risk of hip and upper limb fracture was associated with elevated TMAO (unadjusted OR 3.01, 95% CI: 1.28–7.06; P=0.012). In multivariable analysis, there was an increased risk of hip and upper limb fracture in those patients with elevated TMAO (OR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.21–2.43; P=0.039) after adjusting for possible confounders.
Discussion
TMAO, a gut microbial metabolite, plays role in osteoporosis and fractures [12, 14–15]. In this study, we measured TMAO serum levels of in hip fractures postmenopausal women and age matched healthy women and further assessed its association with fractures risk. The findings were: (1) TMAO serum levels were higher in hip fractures patients than in normal controls; (2) high TMAO levels related to low OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Hs-CRP, High-sensitivity- C-reactive protein; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; TMAO, Trimethylamine-N-oxide
BMD levels; (3) High level of TMAO was proved a predictor of both hip fracture and had upper limb fracture combined hip fracture, after the adjustment of other existing risk factors [e.g., for each 1 uM increase of TMAO, odd ratio 1.16 (95% CI, 1.07–1.25), P < 0.001; and 1.12(95% CI, 1.03–1.26), P=0.008, respectively].
Bone homeostasis is affected by Gut microbiota composition and/or products. Gut microbiota plays role in the various determinants of bone health. Xu et al. [14] reported that bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis, which is influenced by the intestinal microbiota, was associated with host immunity [14]. Another study showed that gut microbiota was a regulator of bone mass and it could effect the gut microbiota on bone mass through the immune system, which in turn regulates osteoclastogenesis [15]. Another study indicated that gut microbiota was an important factor in osteoporosis development [12].
In this study, we reported that gut microbiota–dependent TMAO was associated with hip fracture in postmenopausal women. Similarly, Black et al. [16] showed that uremic toxins from the gut (e.g., p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate) might be involved in the development of bone disease in chronic kidney disease patients and Sjögren et al. [17] also showed that the gut microbiota was a risk factors for bone mass in mice.
Elevated serum levels of TMAO might play role in concomitant fractures. However, the biological mechanism between TMAO and fracture is still uncertainty. There are some possible mechanisms that may involve. First, alterations in the gut microbiome are associated with inflammatory conditions, which related to bone loss through changes in the gut–immune–skeletal axis [18]. In the study, we also reported that serum levels of TMAO were associated with H-CRP. Second, gut microbiota could alter immune status in bone and thereby affected bone resorption [17]. The gut microbiome related to bone loss in several conditions through immune activation and chronic inflammation [18]. Third, the gut microbiome could influence bone condition by altering nutrient absorption, stimulating the immune system or accelerating the transport of microbial products across the gut endothelium [13]. Fourth, gut microbiome could increase calcium absorption and modulate the production of gut serotonin, which was a bone mass regulator [19]. Lastly, gut microbiota could be a regulator of bone mass through mediation of the immune system activation, intestinal calcium absorption and the release of neurotransmitters [12, 20]. Gut microbiota provided an anabolic stimulus to the skeleton, which was intervened by insulin-like growth factor 1 [21].
In this study, we firstly assessed the association between TMAO serum levels and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. However, this observational study does not allow advancing any cause and effect relationships. Whether TMAO directly contributes to fracture in postmenopausal women or circumstances around the fracture have caused changes in the serum levels of TMAO could not be confirmed.
This study included some other limitations. (1) We only included Chinese women, which may affect the generalizability. (2) Hospitalization and/or acute stress associated with the fracture incident [22–23], would most probably change the gut microbiome very rapidly [24–25] and therefore represents a major confounder for this analysis. We should consider this factor in the further study. (3) TMAO levels were tested one time at admission, and the serum TMAO concentrations in male patients were not measured. In addition, patients with hip fracture displayed lower calcium and increased alkaline phosphatase, which might signal presence of more osteomalaica in the hip fracture cohort. As several previous studies have demonstrated much lower vitamin D levels in hip fracture patients [2, 26–27]. The relationship between the serum levels of TMAO, vitamin D and hip fracture need to be elaborated in future research. (4) How serum levels of TMAO are related to changes in gut microbiome are important. Does it reflect an inflammatory gut flora? However, in this study, we did not obtain that information. They need to elaborate more on this issue in further study. (5) The receiver operating characteristic curves are used in the evaluation of the accuracy of serum TMAO levels in predicting individual fracture occurrences, but the evaluation is neither based on internal nor external validation [28].
In summary, we explored serum levels of TMAO changes in Chinese postmenopausal women with hip fracture. Increased TMAO serum levels associated with high risk of hip fracture, suggesting that increase TMAO may contribute to osteoporosis and fracture in postmenopausal women. Further studies are needed to assess the TMAO as a novel therapeutic target for osteoporosis and fracture.
Materials and Methods
Participants
This was a single-center cross-section study. The study period was from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. All postmenopausal women with hip fracture from the Department of Orthopedics of the 89th Hospital of People's Liberation Army (Weifang, China) were screened. The hip fracture was diagnosed by X-ray examination. Exclusion criteria included: (1) gastrointestinal diseases, metabolic syndrome and cancer; (2) infection and/or use of antibiotics; (3) fractures caused by a traffic accident; (4) bilateral hip arthroplasty, hypocalcemia, liver and kidney dysfunction; (5) using estrogens or other bone-active therapies; (6) death or referral during research.
For each patient, one healthy postmenopausal woman matched for age, ethnicities, and body mass index (BMI) was chosen as control case. These healthy women came from our hospital medical examination center. The median age of those women was 65 (IQR, 57–75) years. The exclusion criteria of the control group were consistent with the patient group.
Clinical information
All included women need to finish a standardized questionnaire, which was used to assess the putative risk factors of fractures. The information about age, ethnicities, current tobacco or alcohol use(yes or no), BMI, basic illness (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, neurological disorders, and hyperlipoproteinemia), falls during the last year(yes or no), hip fracture type (cervical or trochanteric), surgical procedure type (arthroplasty or internal fixation) and family history of fragility fractures were obtained. The included patents also were divided into two groups: a hip fracture group and a concomitant fracture of the hip and upper limb fracture group [11]. In addition, total hip bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur was measured using DXA (Hologic QDR2000/QDR4500).
TMAO measurement
At 8:00 am the next day after enrollment, the blood samples of enrollees were collected. Serum was separated and stored at -80°C until analysis. Serum levels of TMAO were tested by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) [29]. The UHPLC-MS/MS system consisted of an Accela autosampler, accela UHPLC binary pump, and a TSQ Quantum Ultra triple quadruple mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). The intra-and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were 4.5%-6.0% and 5.0%-8.0%, respectively. The assay described shows good reproducibility accuracy (>98.0%).
Statistical analysis
Continuous variable was presented as median and interquartile ranges (IQRs]), while categorical variable was expressed as number (%). The differences between groups were tested by Chi-square (categorical variable) and Mann-Whitney U test (continuous variable) [30]. Bivariate correlation was evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation.
Conditional logistic regression analysis (univariable and multivariable) was used to assess the association between serum TMAO levels and risk of fracture. Multivariable model included the following variables: smoker, history of falls during the last year, cardiovascular disease, serum levels of calcium, alkaline phosphatase, high-sensitivity- C-reactive protein and TMAO which had been confirmed in the univariable analysis. The results were presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Lastly, the accuracy of serum TMAO in predicting fracture was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was presented as the results [31]. The optimal cutoff level of serum TMAO was determined. Logistic regression analysis was also used to calculate the OR (95% CI) of fracture for elevated TMAO (defined as TMAO≥cut-off value; with normal TMAO as reference). SPSS 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) were used to perform all statistical analyses and statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.
Ethical statement
The ethics committee of the 89th Hospital of People's Liberation Army approved this research protocol. Written informed consents were obtained from all participants.
Abbreviations
TMAO: Trimethylamine-N-oxide; BMI: Body mass index; Hs-CRP: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; CV: Coefficients of variation; IQR: Interquartile range; OR: Odds ratios; CI: Confidence intervals; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; AUC: Area under the ROC curve; BMD: Bone mineral density.
Author Contributions
Fan S had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Liu Y, Guo Y, Meng S, Gao H, Sui L, Jin S, Li Y, Fan S; Acquisition of data: Liu Y, Guo Y, Meng S, Gao H, Fan S; Analysis and interpretation of data: Liu Y, Guo Y, Meng S, Gao H, Sui L, Jin S, Li Y, Fan S; Drafting of the manuscript: Liu Y, Guo Y, Meng S, Gao H, Sui L, Jin S; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Liu Y, Guo Y, Li Y, Fan S; Administrative, technical, or material support: Liu Y, Guo Y, Meng S, Gao H, Sui L, Jin S, Li Y, Fan S; Study supervision: Fan S
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the staff in the Emergency Department of our Hospital for their support with patient recruitment. We also grateful to the patients who were included this study.
Conflicts of Interest
These authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1. Huang YQ, Jiang T, Su HT, Luo YW, Hou QK. [Gut microbiota and osteoporosis]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016; 37:278–82. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.02.23 [PubMed]
- 2. Fu XM, Fan SG, Li SL, Chen YS, Wu H, Guo YL. Low 25(OH) D serum levels are related with hip fracture in postmenopausal women: a matched case-control study. J Transl Med. 2015; 13:388. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0756-x [PubMed]
- 3. O’Toole PW, Jeffery IB. Gut microbiota and aging. Science. 2015; 350:1214–15. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac8469 [PubMed]
- 4. Ejtahed HS, Soroush AR, Angoorani P, Larijani B, Hasani-Ranjbar S. Gut microbiota as a target in the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders: a new approach to novel therapeutic agents. Horm Metab Res. 2016; 48:349–58. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-107792 [PubMed]
- 5. Rexidamu M, Li H, Jin H, Huang J. Serum levels of trimethylamine-N-oxide in patients with ischemic stroke. Biosci Rep. 2019; 39:BSR20190515. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20190515 [PubMed]
- 6. Papandreou C, Bulló M, Zheng Y, Ruiz-Canela M, Yu E, Guasch-Ferré M, Toledo E, Clish C, Corella D, Estruch R, Ros E, Fitó M, Arós F, et al. Plasma trimethylamine-N-oxide and related metabolites are associated with type 2 diabetes risk in the prevención con dieta mediterránea (PREDIMED) trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018; 108:163–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy058 [PubMed]
- 7. Smits LP, Kootte RS, Levin E, Prodan A, Fuentes S, Zoetendal EG, Wang Z, Levison BS, Cleophas MC, Kemper EM, Dallinga-Thie GM, Groen AK, Joosten LA, et al. Effect of vegan fecal microbiota transplantation on carnitine- and choline-derived trimethylamine-N-oxide production and vascular inflammation in patients with metabolic syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7:e008342. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008342 [PubMed]
- 8. Chen H, Li J, Li N, Liu H, Tang J. Increased circulating trimethylamine N-oxide plays a contributory role in the development of endothelial dysfunction and hypertension in the RUPP rat model of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2019; 38:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2019.1584630 [PubMed]
- 9. Nie J, Xie L, Zhao BX, Li Y, Qiu B, Zhu F, Li GF, He M, Wang Y, Wang B, Liu S, Zhang H, Guo H, et al. Serum trimethylamine N-oxide concentration is positively associated with first stroke in hypertensive patients. Stroke. 2018; 49:2021–28. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021997 [PubMed]
- 10. Qi J, You T, Li J, Pan T, Xiang L, Han Y, Zhu L. Circulating trimethylamine N-oxide and the risk of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 prospective cohort studies. J Cell Mol Med. 2018; 22:185–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.13307 [PubMed]
- 11. Li XB, Liu T, Fan L, Gao Q, Peng Q, Cai T, Wang LM. Circulating serum level of retinoic acid and hip fractures among postmenopausal women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019; 67:336–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15667 [PubMed]
- 12. Wang J, Wang Y, Gao W, Wang B, Zhao H, Zeng Y, Ji Y, Hao D. Diversity analysis of gut microbiota in osteoporosis and osteopenia patients. PeerJ. 2017; 5:e3450. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3450 [PubMed]
- 13. Hernandez CJ. Bone Mechanical Function and the Gut Microbiota. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017; 1033:249–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66653-2_12 [PubMed]
- 14. Xu X, Jia X, Mo L, Liu C, Zheng L, Yuan Q, Zhou X. Intestinal microbiota: a potential target for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone Res. 2017; 5:17046. https://doi.org/10.1038/boneres.2017.46 [PubMed]
- 15. Ohlsson C, Sjögren K. Effects of the gut microbiota on bone mass. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 26:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2014.11.004 [PubMed]
- 16. Black AP, Cardozo LF, Mafra D. Effects of uremic toxins from the gut microbiota on bone: a brief look at chronic kidney disease. Ther Apher Dial. 2015; 19:436–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.12307 [PubMed]
- 17. Sjögren K, Engdahl C, Henning P, Lerner UH, Tremaroli V, Lagerquist MK, Bäckhed F, Ohlsson C. The gut microbiota regulates bone mass in mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27:1357–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1588 [PubMed]
- 18. McGinty T, Mallon PW. Fractures and the gut microbiome. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2018; 13:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0000000000000425 [PubMed]
- 19. D’Amelio P, Sassi F. Gut microbiota, immune system, and bone. Calcif Tissue Int. 2018; 102:415–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-017-0331-y [PubMed]
- 20. McCabe L, Britton RA, Parameswaran N. Prebiotic and probiotic regulation of bone health: role of the intestine and its microbiome. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2015; 13:363–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-015-0292-x [PubMed]
- 21. Yan J, Herzog JW, Tsang K, Brennan CA, Bower MA, Garrett WS, Sartor BR, Aliprantis AO, Charles JF. Gut microbiota induce IGF-1 and promote bone formation and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113:E7554–63. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607235113 [PubMed]
- 22. Jiang T, Veres K, Körmendiné Farkas D, Lash TL, Toft Sørensen H, Gradus JL. Post-traumatic stress disorder and incident fractures in the danish population. Osteoporos Int. 2018; 29:2487–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4644-0 [PubMed]
- 23. Dai W, Liu A, Kaminga AC, Deng J, Lai Z, Yang J, Wen SW. Prevalence of acute stress disorder among road traffic accident survivors: a meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2018; 18:188. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1769-9 [PubMed]
- 24. Kelly JR, Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Clarke G, Hyland NP. Breaking down the barriers: the gut microbiome, intestinal permeability and stress-related psychiatric disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015; 9:392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00392 [PubMed]
- 25. Leclercq S, Forsythe P, Bienenstock J. Posttraumatic stress disorder: does the gut microbiome hold the key? Can J Psychiatry. 2016; 61:204–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743716635535 [PubMed]
- 26. Yao P, Bennett D, Mafham M, Lin X, Chen Z, Armitage J, Clarke R. Vitamin D and calcium for the prevention of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2:e1917789. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17789 [PubMed]
- 27. Lara Alvarez SE, Bell K, Ward N, Cooke C, Inder WJ. Seasonality of hip fracture and vitamin D deficiency persists in a sub-tropical climate. Intern Med J. 2019; 49:1029–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.14391 [PubMed]
-
28.
Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE
Jr . Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal-external, and external validation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 69:245–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.005 [PubMed] - 29. Wang Z, Tang WH, Buffa JA, Fu X, Britt EB, Koeth RA, Levison BS, Fan Y, Wu Y, Hazen SL. Prognostic value of choline and betaine depends on intestinal microbiota-generated metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35:904–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu002 [PubMed]
- 30. Tu WJ, Dong X, Zhao SJ, Yang DG, Chen H. Prognostic value of plasma neuroendocrine biomarkers in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. J Neuroendocrinol. 2013; 25:771–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12052 [PubMed]
- 31. Tu WJ, Qiu HC, Zhang Y, Cao JL, Wang H, Zhao JZ, Liu Q, Zeng X. Lower serum retinoic acid level for prediction of higher risk of mortality in ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2019; 92:e1678–87. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007261 [PubMed]