Aging
Navigate
Priority Research Paper|Volume 12, Issue 9|pp 7626—7638

Prediction of chronological and biological age from laboratory data

Luke Sagers1,2, Luke Melas-Kyriazi1,4, Chirag J Patel2, Arjun K Manrai1,2,3
  • 1Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA
  • 2Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • 3Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
  • 4Department of Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Received: November 19, 2019Accepted: March 3, 2020Published: May 5, 2020

Copyright © 2020 Sagers et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Aging has pronounced effects on blood laboratory biomarkers used in the clinic. Prior studies have largely investigated one biomarker or population at a time, limiting a comprehensive view of biomarker variation and aging across different populations. Here we develop a supervised machine learning approach to study aging using 356 blood biomarkers measured in 67,563 individuals across diverse populations. Our model predicts age with a mean absolute error (MAE), or average magnitude of prediction errors, in held-out data of 4.76 years and an R2 value of 0.92. Age prediction was highly accurate for the pediatric cohort (MAE = 0.87, R2 = 0.94) but inaccurate for ages 65+ (MAE = 4.30, R2 = 0.25). Variability was observed in which biomarkers carry predictive power across age groups, genders, and race/ethnicity groups, and novel candidate biomarkers of aging were identified for specific age ranges (e.g. Vitamin E, ages 18-44). We show that predictors for one age group may fail to generalize to other groups and investigate non-linearity in biomarkers near adulthood. As populations worldwide undergo major demographic changes, it is increasingly important to catalogue biomarker variation across age groups and discover new biomarkers to distinguish chronological and biological aging.