AMPKα pathway involved in hepatic triglyceride metabolism disorder in diet-induced obesity mice following <i>Escherichia coli</i> Infection

Jing Fang; Fengyuan Wang; Hetao Song; Zhengyi Wang; Zhicai Zuo; Hengmin Cui; Yiping Jia; Junliang Deng; Shumin Yu; Yanchun Hu; Liuhong Shen; Xiaoping Ma; Zhihua Ren; Liping Gou

doi:10.18632/aging.101623

Research Paper Volume 10, Issue 11 pp 3161—3172

AMPKα pathway involved in hepatic triglyceride metabolism disorder in diet-induced obesity mice following Escherichia coli Infection

Jing Fang^1, , Fengyuan Wang^1, , Hetao Song^1, , Zhengyi Wang^1,2, , Zhicai Zuo^1, , Hengmin Cui^1, , Yiping Jia^1,3, , Junliang Deng^1, , Shumin Yu^1, , Yanchun Hu^1, , Liuhong Shen^1, , Xiaoping Ma^1, , Zhihua Ren^1, , Liping Gou^1, ,

¹ College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan 611130, PR China
² Sichuan Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, PR China
³ Heze Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Bureau, Heze, Shandong 274000, PR China

* Equal contribution

Received: June 14, 2018 Accepted: October 27, 2018 Published: November 6, 2018

https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101623
How to Cite

Copyright: © 2018 Fang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

To investigate the different effects of acute pulmonary infection induced by Escherichia coli (E. coli) on lipid metabolism between diet-induced obesity (DIO, fed with high-fat diet) mice and lean mice. A total of 180 ICR mice were selected to be challenged intranasally with phosphate-buffered saline or 10⁹ CFUs/mL of E. coli, and the body character indexes, biochemical indexes and expressions of genes and proteins involved in lipid metabolism were examined pre- and post-infection. Results revealed that, before infection, DIO mice had significantly higher body weight, adipose and liver indexes, free fatty acid and triglyceride contents than lean mice. After infection, increased free fatty acid and triglyceride contents, increased expressions of resistin, SREBP-1c, ACC1, FAS and SCD-1, and declined PPARα, CPT-1α expressions and AMPKα phosphorylation were detected in the infected group, while the change rates were more serious in the lean mice than the DIO mice. The above-mentioned findings verified that, after being infected with E. coli, hepatic lipid metabolism disorder was aggravated by activating SREBP-1c related lipid synthesis pathway and inhibiting PPARα related fatty acid oxidation pathway. However, infection-induced lipid metabolic disorders was slighter in the DIO mice than the lean mice through AMPKα pathway.

Introduction

With the improvement of living standards, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become a global public health problem affecting approximately 15-20% of the general population in Asia and over 30% in West [1]. Obesity is an independent factor for NAFLD, which can increase the prevalence of NAFLD by 40%-50%, and almost 2/3 of obese patients are hepatic steatosis [2]. Excessive lipid accumulation, insulin resistance and low-grade inflammation in obesity were suggested to be involved with the development of NAFLD [3]. Additionally, infection and inflammation can cause lipid metabolism disorders. Patients with bacterial or viral infections and animals treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or lipoteichoicacid (LTA) exhibited increased serum triglycerides levels and hepatic lipid accumulation [4]. Our preliminary studies found that obese mice exhibited improved host defenses against infection, and promoting recovery in E. coli-induced acute non-fatal bacterial pneumonia with enhanced immune response [5]. However, other studies showed that obesity was a risk factor for pneumonia [6], nosocomial infections [7], and surgical infections [8]. Therefore, the link between acute infection and obesity remains unknown, especially involving lipid metabolism.

Liver is the primary lipometabolic organ for fatty acid oxidation and de novo fatty acid synthesis, and the presence of NAFLD is associated with hepatic lipid metabolism disorders [9]. Hepatic lipid accumulation is developed as a result of abnormal fatty acid metabolism. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) and sterol regulatory element binding proteins-1c (SREBP-1c) are two important factors known to regulate fatty acid oxidation and de novo fatty acid synthesis in liver by controlling the transcription of their downstream genes respectively. PPARα is a nuclear receptor that regulate lipid metabolism [10] and is also implicated in the development and intensity of inflammatory responses [11]. It modulates the gene transcription of CPT-1α, a rate-limiting enzyme of fatty acid oxidation [12]. SREBP-1c can partly regulate the expression of fatty acid synthase, lipoprotein lipase, and leptin genes [13]. To investigate the mechanism underlying E.coli-induced hepatic lipid metabolism disorder, the levels of PPARα and SREBP-1c and their downstream genes were measured. Furthermore, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a serine/threonine kinase, functions as a critical energy sensor, integrates different signaling pathways to inhibit energy-consuming processes and to activate energy-producing processes. In the present study, basing on AMPKα- PPARα/SREBP-1c signal pathway, we compared hepatic lipid metabolism of lean and DIO mice with E. coli intranasal instillation, to determine whether acute infection could exacerbate lipid disturbance in obesity.

Results

Lipid metabolic abnormalities in DIO mice

After feeding with high-fat diets for 8 weeks, the DIO mice exhibited significantly higher body weight and epididymal adipose tissue index than the lean mice, as well as higher serum concentrations of FFA and TG (p<0.05). Though the liver index showed no obvious changes, the liver TG content in the DIO mice was also markedly increased when compared with the lean mice (p<0.05) (Figure 1). Results suggested that the DIO mice displayed excessive accumulation of adipose tissue and lipid metabolic abnormalities.

Lipid metabolic abnormalities in the DIO mice. (A) body weight, (B) adipose tissue index, (C) serum FFA level, (D) serum TG level, (E) liver index, and (F) liver TG content. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=6); “#” indicates significant differences between the lean and DIO mice (p

Figure 1. Lipid metabolic abnormalities in the DIO mice. (A) body weight, (B) adipose tissue index, (C) serum FFA level, (D) serum TG level, (E) liver index, and (F) liver TG content. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=6); “#” indicates significant differences between the lean and DIO mice (p<0.05).

Differences in weight loss and adipose tissue lipolysis in mice following E. coli infection

Following E. coli infection, compared with uninfected mice, the body weight in both the lean and DIO-infected mice were significantly decreased from 1 to 3 day post-infection (day post-infection = d.p.i), and increased at 4 d.p.i respectively (Table 1). Though the DIO mice had a higher total body weight than the lean mice during the infection, they exhibited greater weight loss from 1 to 3 d.p.i and recovered better at 4 d.p.i (Figure 2A).

Table 1. The body weight, organ indexes and free fatty acid and triglyceride contents.

Index

Groups

Body weight
(g)

DIO-infected

46.42±1.13^A

40.77±0.56^A

38.77±1.41^A

37.95±2.04^A

43.52±3.37^A

DIO-uninfected

46.49±0.54^A

47.17±1.04^B

47.53±1.45^B

47.86±1.46^B

47.27±1.43^B

Lean-infected

36.92±1.05^B

33.52±1.41^C

31.97±2.47^C

30.05±3.9^C

31.25±2.61^C

Lean-uninfected

37.15±0.96^B

37.40±1.18^D

38.00±1.27^A

37.89±0.89^A

38.04±0.76^D

Adipose tissue index
(%)

DIO-infected

3.73±0.2^A

2.09±0.19^A

1.93±0.16^A

1.58±0.1^A

1.8±0.26^A

DIO-uninfected

3.68±0.18^A

3.72±0.16^B

3.73±0.16^B

3.66±0.14^B

3.76±0.22^B

Lean-infected

1.49±0.25^B

1.45±0.09^C

1.52±0.12^C

1.16±0.22^C

1.04±0.08^C

Lean-uninfected

1.45±0.15^B

1.5±0.09^C

1.51±0.15^C

1.48±0.09^A

1.53±0.07^A

Liver index
(%)

DIO-infected

4.54±0.45^A

5.33±0.55^A

5.61±0.52^A

5.83±0.77^A

5.15±0.32^A

DIO-uninfected

4.50±0.47^A

4.51±0.24^B

4.54±0.57^B

4.51±0.44^B

4.63±0.71^B

Lean-infected

4.62±0.34^A

5.28±0.42^A

5.62±0.34^A

6.08±1.00^A

5.91±0.75^C

Lean-uninfected

4.64±0.44^A

4.72±0.47^B

4.68±0.44^B

4.69±0.64^B

4.67±0.38^B

Serum FFA
(umol/L)

DIO-infected

21.2±0.81^A

23.64±0.95^A

23.86±0.57^A

22.43±0.49^A

21.74±0.89^A

DIO-uninfected

20.58±0.99^A

21.21±1.31^B

20.19±0.98^B

20.47±0.73^B

20.88±1.19^A

Lean-infected

15.27±1.04^B

17.05±0.8^C

17.19±0.83^C

17.86±0.48^C

17.97±0.63^B

Lean-uninfected

15.07±0.79^B

15.65±0.8^C

15.76±0.83^D

15.59±1.39^D

15.53±0.77^C

Serum TG
(mmol/L)

DIO-infected

1.39±0.03^A

1.62±0.11^A

1.78±0.11^A

1.85±0.18^A

1.73±0.15^A

DIO-uninfected

1.43±0.06^A

1.37±0.06^B

1.33±0.09^B

1.3±0.12^B

1.33±0.05^B

Lean-infected

1.06±0.04^B

1.21±0.08^C

1.36±0.05^B

1.45±0.1^B

1.36±0.07^B

Lean-uninfected

1.12±0.08^B

1.02±0.05^D

0.97±0.1^C

1.05±0.08^C

1.08±0.12^C

Hepatic TG
(mmol/g)

DIO-infected

0.72±0.02^A

0.74±0.02^A

0.79±0.01^A

0.85±0.07^A

0.84±0.04^A

DIO-uninfected

0.72±0.03^A

0.71±0.06^B

0.73±0.04^B

0.72±0.02^B

Lean-infected

0.40±0.01^B

0.50±0.04^B

0.68±0.03^B

0.71±0.05^B

0.68±0.02^B

Lean-uninfected

0.40±0.01^B

0.40±0.02^C

0.41±0.03^C

0.42±0.03^C

0.40±0.03^C

Notes: Values are displayed as mean ± SD (N=6). In the same column, values with different letter mean significant difference (P<0.05), while those with the same letter mean no significant difference (P>0.05).

Effects of E. coli infection on body weight and adipose tissue lipolysis in the lean and DIO mice. (A) Body weight, (B) adipose tissue index, (C) serum FFA levels, (D) serum TG levels, (E) Liver index and (F) Hepatic TG contents. DIO indicates the ratio of DIO-infected/ DIO-uninfected, while Lean indicated the ratio of lean-infected/ lean-uninfected.

Figure 2. Effects of E. coli infection on body weight and adipose tissue lipolysis in the lean and DIO mice. (A) Body weight, (B) adipose tissue index, (C) serum FFA levels, (D) serum TG levels, (E) Liver index and (F) Hepatic TG contents. DIO indicates the ratio of DIO-infected/ DIO-uninfected, while Lean indicated the ratio of lean-infected/ lean-uninfected.

In the DIO-infected mice, the epididymal adipose tissue indexes markedly declined during the whole experiment, and fell to the lowest point at 3 d.p.i, but only showed the decreased tendency in the lean-infected mice after E.coli infection (Table 1). The change rates of epididymal adipose tissue indexes of the DIO mice were more obvious than those of the lean mice at all-time points (Figure 2B).

The levels of FFA and TG in serum in the lean and DIO-infected mice were significantly increased during the infection compared with the lean and DIO-uninfected mice, respectively (Table 1). However, the change rates of serum FFA and TG in the DIO mice were more obvious compared with the lean mice before 3 d.p.i (Figure 2C) at 3 and 4 d.p.i (Figure 2D), respectively.

Increased hepatic lipid accumulation in mice following E. coli infection

As shown in Table 1, the liver indexes and hepatic TG contents in both the lean and DIO-infected mice were significantly increased in response to E.coli administration, and reached peak at 3 d.p.i (p<0.05) and dropped at 4 d.p.i compared with each uninfected mice. The change rates of liver indexes following infection were increase in the DIO mice at 1 and 2 d.p.i, but obviously dropped at 4 d.p.i compared with the lean mice (Figure 2E). Compared with the lean mice at the same time point, the DIO mice exhibited higher hepatic TG contents, but the change rates of hepatic TG contents in the DIO mice were obviously lower than those of the lean mice after infection (p<0.05) (Figure 2F).

Effects of E.coli infection on mRNA levels of hepatic lipid synthesis and oxidation related transcription factors in mice

From Figure 3, following E.coli infection, the mRNA levels of PPARα and its target gene CPT-1α in livers of both the lean and DIO-infected mice were significantly decreased from 1 to 4 d.p.i, and fell to the lowest points at 1 or 2 d.p.i compared with each uninfected mice (p<0.05). Moreover, the declined PPARα and CPT1α expressions in the DIO mice were slighter than those in the lean mice. (p<0.05).

Effect of E. coli infection on the mRNA expression of hepatic lipid metabolism related genes in the lean and DIO mice by qRT-PCR. (A) PPARα, (B) CPT-1α, (C) SREBP-1c, (D) ACC1, (E) FAS, (F) SCD-1 and (G) Resisin. Values are displayed as mean ± SD (n=6). “*”p

Figure 3. Effect of E. coli infection on the mRNA expression of hepatic lipid metabolism related genes in the lean and DIO mice by qRT-PCR. (A) PPARα, (B) CPT-1α, (C) SREBP-1c, (D) ACC1, (E) FAS, (F) SCD-1 and (G) Resisin. Values are displayed as mean ± SD (n=6). “*”p<0.05 compared with the control (0 d or pre-infection) within the time of infection; “#”p<0.05 between the lean and DIO mice at the same time point of infection.

The mRNA levels of SREBP-1c, ACC1 and FAS were significantly increased in both the lean and DIO-infected mice after infection and peaked at 1 or 2 d.p.i (p<0.05) when compared with the uninfected mice. However, the expression of SCD-1 markedly decreased from 1 to 2 d.p.i firstly, and then significantly increased from 3 to 4 d.p.i (p<0.05). Compared with the lean mice, the DIO mice mainly exhibited lower expressions of these genes. (p<0.05).

Compared with the uninfected mice, after being infected with E.coli, the mRNA level of resistin was significantly increased in both the lean and DIO-infected mice, and reached a peak at 2 d.p.i. Moreover, when compared with the lean mice, the expression of resistin in the DIO mice was relative low (p<0.05) (Figure 3G).

Effects of E.coli infection on relative protein levels of hepatic lipid synthesis and oxidation related factors in mice

As shown in Figure 4, after E. coli infection, the relative protein levels of PPARα in both the lean and DIO-infected mice were significantly decreased at 2 and 4 d.p.i compared with each uninfected mice, and this decrease were significantly in the DIO mice lower than in the lean mice (p<0.05). However, the protein levels of SREBP-1c showed no obvious changes in response to E.coli infection (p>0.05). When compared with the uninfected mice, phosphorylation of AMPKα was notably decreased in both the lean and DIO-infected mice after being infected with E.coli (p<0.05), and this decrease was more obviously in the lean mice at 4 d.p.i than the DIO mice.

Effect of E. coli infection on the protein levels of PPARα, SREBP-1c and p-AMPK/AMPK in liver of the lean and DIO mice by Western blotting. (A) PPARα, (B) SREBP-1c, (C) p-AMPK/AMPK. Values are displayed as mean ± SD (n=6). “*”p

Figure 4. Effect of E. coli infection on the protein levels of PPARα, SREBP-1c and p-AMPK/AMPK in liver of the lean and DIO mice by Western blotting. (A) PPARα, (B) SREBP-1c, (C) p-AMPK/AMPK. Values are displayed as mean ± SD (n=6). “*”p<0.05 compared with the control (0 d or pre-infection) within the time of infection; “#”p<0.05 between the lean and DIO mice at the same time point of infection.

Discussion

Lipid metabolism disorder induced by inflammation or infection was characterized by increased plasma TG levels and accumulated hepatic lipid resulted from adipose tissue lipolysis, increased de novo hepatic fatty acid synthesis, and suppression of fatty acid oxidation [4]. As a risk factor of metabolic syndrome, obesity was also linked to the lipid metabolic disorder. The chronic low-grade inflammations were suggested to play an important role in the development of obesity-associated dyslipidemia [14]. However, there were few researches regarding the effect of acute infection on lipid metabolism in obesity. By the reports as to obese populations, obese patients had increased susceptibility to bacterial infection, especially bacterial lung injury [15]. Previous study also demonstrated that obese mice infected with E. coli-induced acute lung injury exhibited higher levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 in serum [5]. In this study, the triglyceride metabolism of DIO mice following intranasal administration of 10⁹ CFUs/mL of E. coli was detected to determine the effect of gram-negative bacteria-induced acute lung injury on the lipid metabolic disorders in obesity.

After feeding with a high-fat diet for 8 weeks, the DIO mice had higher adipose tissue and liver index, serum FFA and TG contents, as well as hepatic TG contents, suggesting that the DIO mice exhibited excessive fat accumulation and dyslipidemia. After being infected with E. coli, the contents of serum FFA in both the lean and DIO-infected mice were significantly increased. Similarly, as reported previously, LPS-treated Zucker ^fat/fat mice had increased serum FFA levels for the increased lipolysis [16]. Moreover, circulating FFA could be taken up by tissues (muscle, heart, liver, etc.) for energy supplying, however, when the amount of FFA entering the liver was greater than its disposal, excess TG would be synthesized and secreted into blood or stored in liver, led to hypertriglyceridemia and hepatic steatosis [16]. Marangoni et al. reported that BALB/c mice displayed significantly increased serum TG contents in response to acute liver infection induced by intraperitoneal administration of Chlamydia pneumoniae [17]. Therefore, E. coli- induced acute pulmonary infection could aggravate the dyslipidemia in both the lean and DIO mice.

Adipose tissue is an important organ of lipid deposition which can be recruited in times of need to provide fuel for other organs [18]. Following E. coli infection in this study, the DIO-infected mice experienced greater loss of adipose tissue index from 1 to 4 d.p.i, indicating that stronger fat mobilization was taken place in the DIO mice than the lean mice. Liver is the central organ of lipid metabolism that maintains balance between lipid availability and lipid disposal [19]. Long-term ethanol consumption, infection or other specific etiologies might induce hepatic lipid accumulation [20-22]. Chen et al. reported that intraperitoneal injections of LPS for 24h was able to increase the liver weight and hepatic TG contents in CD-1 mice [23]. Moreover, chronic infection caused by continuous injection of LPS for 12 weeks had also determined to accelerate hepatic steatosis in high-disaccharide fed Zucker ^fat/fat mice [24]. In the present study, following E.coli infection, although the actual levels of hepatic TG in the DIO mice were higher than those in the lean mice, the change rates of hepatic TG contents were less in the DIO mice than the lean mice. As is known, triglycerides are the main constituents of body fat in humans and other animals, and liver cells is a place to synthesize and store triglycerides [25]. As a composition of adipose tissue, following the decrease of the adipose tissue index, the amount of hepatic TG might be declined, however, as infection induced hepatic lipid accumulation, the hepatic TG would increase. In our results, infection induced hepatic TG increasing was greater than fat loss induced hepatic TG decreasing, while it still play a role. Thus, the increasing rate of hepatic TG contents was slighter in the DIO mice than the Lean mice. These findings were similar to Zhang’s research [26], which indicated that high-fat diet-induced obesity might have increased tolerance to acute inflammation. Nevertheless, the mechanisms remain unclear.

Infection and inflammation induced fatty acids oxidation decreasing and lipid synthesis enhancing are regulated by several transcriptional factors and enzymes, like PPARα and SREBP-1c [27]. To clarify the underlying mechanism, these transcriptional factors and enzymes were measured. Previous studies reported that infection and inflammation increased the expression of SREBP-1c and its target genes, like FAS and ACC, while inhibited the expression of PPARα in vivo and in vitro [17,28-30]. Also, high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis in obese mice were associated with inhibited PPARα activity and increased expressions of SREBP-1c, as well as its target genes, FAS and SCD-1 [31,32]. In addition, infection and inflammation could also modulate hepatic FFA oxidation and synthase. In the present study, 10⁹ CFUs/mL E. coli could up-regulate the expression of hepatic SREBP-1c, ACC1 (one subset of ACC) and FAS, and down-regulate the expression of PPARα and CPT-1α, which was accordance with LPS-induced infection in CD-1 mice [23]. These results suggested that E.coli infection aggravated hepatic triglyceride accumulation in the lean and DIO-infected mice, which at least partially attributing to the inhibition of hepatic FFA oxidation and activation of de novo fatty acid syntheses. However, it should be highlighted that we expected classical increase of SCD-1 mRNA level as SREBP-1c increased, however, SCD-1 mRNA level declined markedly at 1 and 2 d.p.i, and then increased significantly at 3 and 4 d.p.i. SCD-1 is a kind of endoplasmic reticulum enzyme that catalyzes the saturated fatty acid to form a single unsaturated fatty acid, providing substrates for the synthesis of TG [33]. The inconsistency between SREBP-1c and SCD-1 mRNA level may partly attribute to the other regulators, such as leptin, which can directly regulate the expression of SCD-1 by mechanisms independent of SREBP-1c [34], or monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) derived from extrahepatic tissues, which can increase the hepatic lipid accumulation without the effect of SCD-1 [35]. Moreover, in the present study, the expression of resistin showed a more tremendous increase in the lean mice than the DIO mice after infection. Resistin is an adipose-derived hormone, which was first identified in mouse adipose tissue as a negatively regulated PPARs responsive gene [36,37]. In the setting of obesity, resistin acted as adipocytokine and possessed proinflammatory property [38]. Above all, resistin played an important role in the process of lipid metabolism and inflammation in obesity. Moreover, Seo et al. reported that ADD/SREBP1c control resistin gene expression upon nutrition regulation and adipogenesis [37]. Thus, the lean mice exhibited greater inhibition effect of the PPARα expression than that of the DIO mice, and showed sharper increase of SREBP-1c expression under the control of resistin.

Activated AMPKα could inhibit the expression of SREBP-1c [39] and up-regulate the transcription levels of PPARα in liver [40]. High-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis in obesity was associated with decreased AMPKα activity and disturbed PPARα and SREBP-1c related lipid metabolism signaling pathway [39,41]. In the present study, the ratio of p-AMPKα/AMPKα was decreased more slightly in response to E. coli infection in the DIO mice than in the lean mice, which was consistent with the changes of SREBP-1c and PPARα. Similarly, Andreasen et al. also reported that intravenous bolus of LPS had no significant influence on AMPKα phosphorylation in skeletal muscle between type II diabetes patients and normal ones [42].

In summary, E. coli-induced acute lung infection aggravated dyslipidemia in mice by inhibiting PPARα related fatty acid oxidation pathway and activating SREBP-1c related lipid synthesis pathway, which resulted from the decreased phosphorylation of AMPKα. E. coli-induced change rate of lipid metabolism-associated parameters was slighter in the DIO mice than the lean mice, which may be partially related to the effect of resistin. These suggested that obesity could improve host tolerance to acute infection-induced lipid metabolic disorders (the proposed mechanisms showing in the Figure 5).

Schematic representation of Escherichia Coli induced hepatic triglyceride metabolism disorder in the lean and diet-induced obese mice through AMPKα pathway.

Figure 5. Schematic representation of Escherichia Coli induced hepatic triglyceride metabolism disorder in the lean and diet-induced obese mice through AMPKα pathway.

Materials and Methods

Animals

21 to 28-day-old male ICR mice were purchased from Dashuo Biological Technology Company (Chengdu, China). The mice were kept in specific free-pathogen conditions and received either a normal or high-fat diet for 8 weeks, by which Lean and DIO mice could be obtained [43]. Both of normal and high-fat diets were purchased from Dashuo (Chengdu, China). According to the standard of human obesity, DIO mice were considered when the obese index was over 20% by the following formula [44].

$O b e s e i n d e x = \frac{I n d i v i d u a l w e i g h t o f D I O - A v e r a g e w e i g h t o f L e a n}{A v e r a g e w e i g h t o f L e a n} \times 100 %$

Then, the DIO and Lean mice were subdivided into 4 groups, namely DIO-infected, DIO-uninfected, lean-infected and lean-uninfected, respectively. The infected mice were anesthetized with ether and challenged intranasally with 40μL of bacterial suspension containing approximately 10⁹ CFUs/mL of E. coli diluted in PBS, and the uninfected mice were given same amount of PBS by the same way. E. coli was supplied by the Sichuan Agricultural University Veterinary Medical Laboratory. Preliminary study determined that 10⁹ CFUs/mL E. coli was able to elicit acute lung infection without any mortality in either DIO or Lean mice [5]. Food and water for mice were supplied ad libitum. The animals were used under protocols approved by the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the Ethics Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (Approval No: 2012-024).

Body weight and organs index

At indicated time points, 0 d (pre-infection) and 1 d, 2 d, 3 d, 4 d (post-infection), body weight of mice were measured. Then mice were anesthetized with ether and euthanized, epididymal adipose tissue and liver were collected and weighed. Organ index was calculated by the following formula:

$O r g a n i n d e x = \frac{O r g a n w e i g h t (g)}{B o d y w e i g h t (g)} \times 100 %$

Serum triglycerides and free fatty acid analyses

Blood samples were obtained retro-orbitally and individual sera were separated via centrifugation and stored at -20°C. Triglycerides and free fatty acid concentrations in the serum were measured with a commercially available kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Hepatic triglycerides analyses

Liver samples were homogenized in ice-cold phosphatic buffer solution according to the ratio of weight (g): Volume (ml) = 1:9, 2500r/min, centrifuge for 10 minutes to obtain the supernatant solution. Hepatic triglycerides content was determined using a commercially available kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China).

RNA isolation, reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the liver by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The RNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically on a Nano Drop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, US). One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using standard reagents (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM II kit (TAKARA BIO Inc) using the following primer (Table 2). The amplification reactions were carried out with an initial step (95°C for 30 s, 1 cycle) and the second step (95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 30 s, 39 cycles), finally, specific transcripts were confirmed by melting-curve profiles (cooling the sample to 65°C and heating slowly to 95°C with measurement of fluorescence). Relative gene expression was defined as a ratio of target gene expression versus β-actin gene expression. The 2^-ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the relative expression levels in mRNA abundance.

Table 2. Primers used for RT-PCR.

Items	Sense (5’-to- 3’)	Antisense (5’-to- 3’)
RETN	CTTCCTTGTCCCTGAACTGC	ACGAATGTCCCACGAGCC
PPARα	GAAGCTTTGGTTTTGCAGACT	GTCCCCACATATTCGACACTC
CPT-1α	CGAAGAACATCGTGAGTGG	GACGTCTGGAAGCTGTACAAC
SREBP-1c	CTTCTGGAGACATCGCAAAC	GGTAGACAACAGCCGCATC
ACC1	GGCAGCAGTTACACCACATAC	TCATTACCTCAATCTCAGCATAGC
FAS	GCACAGAAGGGAAGGAGT	CCAGGAGAATCGCAGTAG
SCD-1	CTGACCTGAAAGCCGAGAA	GTGAGACCAGTTGCG

Western blotting

Hepatic total lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred on to a nitrocellulose membrane in an electrophoretic transfer cell (Bio-Rad, USA). At room temperature, the membranes were washed by TBST and blocked with 5% skimmed milk, then incubated with the following antibodies: anti-p-AMPKα-Thr172, anti-AMPKα, anti-SREBP-1c, anti-PPARα, anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C. After incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Boster Bio-Engineering Co., Ltd), the membranes were washed and detected using diaminobenzidine (DAB) reagent (Tiangen, China).

Statistical analysis

The significance of difference was analyzed by variance analysis, and results were presented as mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD). And Two-tailed, unpaired Student's t test was used to assess significance, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. The change rate was calculated by the following formula, and DIO and Lean in the figure 2 indicated the change rate of the lean and DIO mice, respectively.

Change rate (%) = value of infected mice/value of uninfected mice ×100%

Author Contributions

Z.Z. conceived the study; J.F., and H.C. designed the experiment; F.W. interpreted the results, and wrote the manuscript; H. S., Z.W. and Y.J. executed experiments and analyzed the data; J.D., S.Y., Y.H., L.S. and X.M. assisted with writing the manuscript. Z.R. and L.G. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2013NZ0032).

References

1. Federico A, Dallio M, Masarone M, Persico M, Loguercio C. The epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its connection with cardiovascular disease: role of endothelial dysfunction. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016; 20:4731–41. [PubMed]
2. Lazo M, Clark JM. The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a global perspective. Semin Liver Dis. 2008; 28:339–50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1091978 [PubMed]
3. Dietrich P, Hellerbrand C. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014; 28:637–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2014.07.008 [PubMed]
4. Khovidhunkit W, Kim MS, Memon RA, Shigenaga JK, Moser AH, Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. Effects of infection and inflammation on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism: mechanisms and consequences to the host. J Lipid Res. 2004; 45:1169–96. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R300019-JLR200 [PubMed]
5. Wan T, Yuan G, Ren Y, Zuo Z, Wang Z, Jia Y, Cui H, Peng X, Fang J, Deng J, Yu S, Hu Y, Shen L, et al. Diet-induced obese mice exhibit altered immune responses to acute lung injury induced by Escherichia coli. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016; 24:2101–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21608 [PubMed]
6. Lawrence CB, Brough D, Knight EM. Obese mice exhibit an altered behavioural and inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide. Dis Model Mech. 2012; 5:649–59. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.009068 [PubMed]
7. Huttunen R, Karppelin M, Syrjänen J. Obesity and nosocomial infections. J Hosp Infect. 2013; 85:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2013.06.012 [PubMed]
8. Winfield RD, Reese S, Bochicchio K, Mazuski JE, Bochicchio GV. Obesity and the Risk for Surgical Site Infection in Abdominal Surgery. Am Surg. 2016; 82:331–36. [PubMed]
9. Angin Y, Beauloye C, Horman S, Bertrand L. 2016. Regulation of Carbohydrate Metabolism, Lipid Metabolism, and Protein Metabolism by AMPK: Springer International Publishing.
10. Chinetti G, Lestavel S, Bocher V, Remaley AT, Neve B, Torra IP, Teissier E, Minnich A, Jaye M, Duverger N, Brewer HB, Fruchart JC, Clavey V, Staels B. PPAR-α and PPAR-γ activators induce cholesterol removal from human macrophage foam cells through stimulation of the ABCA1 pathway. Nat Med. 2001; 7:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/83348 [PubMed]
11. Berger J, Moller DE. 2002. The mechanisms of action of PPARs: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
12. Patsouris D, Reddy JK, Müller M, Kersten S. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha mediates the effects of high-fat diet on hepatic gene expression. Endocrinology. 2006; 147:1508–16. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2005-1132 [PubMed]
13. Kolehmainen M, Vidal H, Alhava E, Uusitupa MI. Sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c (SREBP-1c) expression in human obesity. Obes Res. 2001; 9:706–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2001.95 [PubMed]
14. Yudkin JS. Inflammation, obesity, and the metabolic syndrome. Horm Metab Res. 2007; 39:707–09. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-985898 [PubMed]
15. Kornum JB, Nørgaard M, Dethlefsen C, Due KM, Thomsen RW, Tjønneland A, Sørensen HT, Overvad K. Obesity and risk of subsequent hospitalisation with pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2010; 36:1330–36. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00184209 [PubMed]
16. Fabbrini E, Magkos F. Hepatic Steatosis as a Marker of Metabolic Dysfunction. Nutrients. 2015; 7:4995–5019. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7064995 [PubMed]
17. Marangoni A, Fiorino E, Gilardi F, Aldini R, Scotti E, Nardini P, Foschi C, Donati M, Montagnani M, Cevenini M, Franco P, Roda A, Crestani M, Cevenini R. Chlamydia pneumoniae acute liver infection affects hepatic cholesterol and triglyceride metabolism in mice. Atherosclerosis. 2015; 241:471–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.05.023 [PubMed]
18. Müller S, Kulenkampff E, Wolfrum C. Adipose Tissue Stem Cells. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 201; 233:251–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2015_13 [PubMed]
19. He J, Dong L, Xu W, Bai K, Lu C, Wu Y, Huang Q, Zhang L, Wang T. Dietary Tributyrin Supplementation Attenuates Insulin Resistance and Abnormal Lipid Metabolism in Suckling Piglets with Intrauterine Growth Retardation. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0136848. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136848 [PubMed]
20. Ma KL, Ruan XZ, Powis SH, Chen Y, Moorhead JF, Varghese Z. Inflammatory stress exacerbates lipid accumulation in hepatic cells and fatty livers of apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Hepatology. 2008; 48:770–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22423 [PubMed]
21. Sun HY, Lin CC, Tsai PJ, Tsai WJ, Lee JC, Tsao CW, Cheng PN, Wu IC, Chiu YC, Chang TT, Young KC. Lipoprotein lipase liberates free fatty acids to inhibit HCV infection and prevent hepatic lipid accumulation. Cell Microbiol. 2017; 19:19. https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12673 [PubMed]
22. Kim YJ, Hwang SH, Jia Y, Seo WD, Lee SJ. Barley sprout extracts reduce hepatic lipid accumulation in ethanol-fed mice by activating hepatic AMP-activated protein kinase. Food Res Int. 2017; 101:209–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.08.068 [PubMed]
23. Chen X, Zhang C, Zhao M, Shi CE, Zhu RM, Wang H, Zhao H, Wei W, Li JB, Xu DX. Melatonin alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatic SREBP-1c activation and lipid accumulation in mice. J Pineal Res. 2011; 51:416–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079X.2011.00905.x [PubMed]
24. Fukunishi S, Sujishi T, Takeshita A, Ohama H, Tsuchimoto Y, Asai A, Tsuda Y, Higuchi K. Lipopolysaccharides accelerate hepatic steatosis in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Zucker rats. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2014; 54:39–44. https://doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.13-49 [PubMed]
25. Cox MM, Nelson DL. (2000). Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry (3rd ed.). (New York: Worth Publishing.
26. Zhang Y, Han TT, Budegerile SU, Jiang DD, Yang-Xue LI, Yao-Min HU. Responsive ability of obese non-diabetic rats to acute inflammatory stimulus. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University. 2013; 33:400–03.
27. Chen Y, Varghese Z, Ruan XZ. The molecular pathogenic role of inflammatory stress in dysregulation of lipid homeostasis and hepatic steatosis. Genes Dis. 2014; 1:106–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2014.07.007 [PubMed]
28. Shi C, Chen X, Zhang C. The role of SREBP-1c activation in lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatic lipid accumulation in mice. Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui. 2011; 46:1227–31.
29. Ma KL, Ruan XZ, Powis SH, Chen Y, Moorhead JF, Varghese Z. Inflammatory stress exacerbates lipid accumulation in hepatic cells and fatty livers of apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Hepatology. 2008; 48:770–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22423 [PubMed]
30. Endo M, Masaki T, Seike M, Yoshimatsu H. TNF-alpha induces hepatic steatosis in mice by enhancing gene expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c). Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2007; 232:614–21. [PubMed]
31. Ohhira M, Motomura W, Fukuda M, Yoshizaki T, Takahashi N, Tanno S, Wakamiya N, Kohgo Y, Kumei S, Okumura T. Lipopolysaccharide induces adipose differentiation-related protein expression and lipid accumulation in the liver through inhibition of fatty acid oxidation in mice. J Gastroenterol. 2007; 42:969–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-007-2119-8 [PubMed]
32. Cintra DE, Ropelle ER, Vitto MF, Luciano TF, Souza DR, Engelmann J, Marques SO, Lira FS, de Pinho RA, Pauli JR, De Souza CT. RETRACTED: Reversion of hepatic steatosis by exercise training in obese mice: the role of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c. Life Sci. 2012; 91:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2012.08.002 [PubMed]
33. Flowers MT, Ntambi JM. Role of stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase in regulating lipid metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2008; 19:248–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0b013e3282f9b54d [PubMed]
34. Biddinger SB, Miyazaki M, Boucher J, Ntambi JM, Kahn CR. Leptin suppresses stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 by mechanisms independent of insulin and sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c. Diabetes. 2006; 55:2032–41. https://doi.org/10.2337/db05-0742 [PubMed]
35. Miyazaki M, Flowers MT, Sampath H, Chu K, Otzelberger C, Liu X, Ntambi JM. Hepatic stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 deficiency protects mice from carbohydrate-induced adiposity and hepatic steatosis. Cell Metab. 2007; 6:484–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.014 [PubMed]
36. Muse ED, Obici S, Bhanot S, Monia BP, McKay RA, Rajala MW, Scherer PE, Rossetti L. Role of resistin in diet-induced hepatic insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2004; 114:232–39. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI200421270 [PubMed]
37. Seo JB, Noh MJ, Yoo EJ, Park SY, Park J, Lee IK, Park SD, Kim JB. Functional characterization of the human resistin promoter with adipocyte determination- and differentiation-dependent factor 1/sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c and CCAAT enhancer binding protein-alpha. Mol Endocrinol. 2003; 17:1522–33. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2003-0028 [PubMed]
38. Mancuso P. Obesity and lung inflammation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010; 108:722–28. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00781.2009 [PubMed]
39. Li Y, Xu S, Mihaylova MM, Zheng B, Hou X, Jiang B, Park O, Luo Z, Lefai E, Shyy JY, Gao B, Wierzbicki M, Verbeuren TJ, et al. AMPK phosphorylates and inhibits SREBP activity to attenuate hepatic steatosis and atherosclerosis in diet-induced insulin-resistant mice. Cell Metab. 2011; 13:376–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2011.03.009 [PubMed]
40. Bronner M, Hertz R, Bar-Tana J. Kinase-independent transcriptional co-activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha by AMP-activated protein kinase. Biochem J. 2004; 384:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20040955 [PubMed]
41. Barroso E, Rodríguez-Calvo R, Serrano-Marco L, Astudillo AM, Balsinde J, Palomer X, Vázquez-Carrera M. The PPARβ/δ activator GW501516 prevents the down-regulation of AMPK caused by a high-fat diet in liver and amplifies the PGC-1α-Lipin 1-PPARα pathway leading to increased fatty acid oxidation. Endocrinology. 2011; 152:1848–59. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2010-1468 [PubMed]
42. Andreasen AS, Kelly M, Berg RM, Møller K, Pedersen BK. Type 2 diabetes is associated with altered NF-κB DNA binding activity, JNK phosphorylation, and AMPK phosphorylation in skeletal muscle after LPS. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e23999. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023999 [PubMed]
43. Açari D, Bartchewsky W. W dos Santos T, A Oliveira K, Funck A, Jose P, F.F. de Souza M, J Saad M, H.M. Bastos D, Gambero A, Carvalho P, Ribeiro M. Antiobesity Effects of yerba maté Extract (Ilex paraguariensis) in High-fat Diet–induced Obese Mice. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009; 17:2127–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2009.158
44. Lili z. Mechanism of capsaicin and its receptor TRPV1 in obesity prevention. Army Medical University. 2006 .

Research Paper Volume 10, Issue 11 pp 3161—3172

AMPKα pathway involved in hepatic triglyceride metabolism disorder in diet-induced obesity mice following Escherichia coli Infection

Jing Fang^1, , Fengyuan Wang^1, , Hetao Song^1, , Zhengyi Wang^1,2, , Zhicai Zuo^1, , Hengmin Cui^1, , Yiping Jia^1,3, , Junliang Deng^1, , Shumin Yu^1, , Yanchun Hu^1, , Liuhong Shen^1, , Xiaoping Ma^1, , Zhihua Ren^1, , Liping Gou^1, ,

Received: June 14, 2018 Accepted: October 27, 2018 Published: November 6, 2018

Abstract

Introduction

Results

Lipid metabolic abnormalities in DIO mice

Differences in weight loss and adipose tissue lipolysis in mice following E. coli infection

Table 1. The body weight, organ indexes and free fatty acid and triglyceride contents.

Increased hepatic lipid accumulation in mice following E. coli infection

Effects of E.coli infection on mRNA levels of hepatic lipid synthesis and oxidation related transcription factors in mice

Effects of E.coli infection on relative protein levels of hepatic lipid synthesis and oxidation related factors in mice

Discussion

Materials and Methods

Animals

Body weight and organs index

Serum triglycerides and free fatty acid analyses

Hepatic triglycerides analyses

RNA isolation, reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR

Table 2. Primers used for RT-PCR.

Western blotting

Statistical analysis

Author Contributions

Conflicts of Interest

Funding

References

Corresponding Author

Keywords

Paper Sections

Research Paper Volume 10, Issue 11 pp 3161—3172

AMPKα pathway involved in hepatic triglyceride metabolism disorder in diet-induced obesity mice following Escherichia coli Infection

Jing Fang1, , Fengyuan Wang1, , Hetao Song1, , Zhengyi Wang1,2, , Zhicai Zuo1, , Hengmin Cui1, , Yiping Jia1,3, , Junliang Deng1, , Shumin Yu1, , Yanchun Hu1, , Liuhong Shen1, , Xiaoping Ma1, , Zhihua Ren1, , Liping Gou1, ,

Received: June 14, 2018 Accepted: October 27, 2018 Published: November 6, 2018

Cite this Article

How to cite

Copy or Download citation:

Abstract

Introduction

Results

Lipid metabolic abnormalities in DIO mice

Differences in weight loss and adipose tissue lipolysis in mice following E. coli infection

Table 1. The body weight, organ indexes and free fatty acid and triglyceride contents.

Increased hepatic lipid accumulation in mice following E. coli infection

Effects of E.coli infection on mRNA levels of hepatic lipid synthesis and oxidation related transcription factors in mice

Effects of E.coli infection on relative protein levels of hepatic lipid synthesis and oxidation related factors in mice

Discussion

Materials and Methods

Animals

Body weight and organs index

Serum triglycerides and free fatty acid analyses

Hepatic triglycerides analyses

RNA isolation, reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR

Table 2. Primers used for RT-PCR.

Western blotting

Statistical analysis

Author Contributions

Conflicts of Interest

Funding

References

Corresponding Author

Keywords

Paper Sections

Jing Fang^1, , Fengyuan Wang^1, , Hetao Song^1, , Zhengyi Wang^1,2, , Zhicai Zuo^1, , Hengmin Cui^1, , Yiping Jia^1,3, , Junliang Deng^1, , Shumin Yu^1, , Yanchun Hu^1, , Liuhong Shen^1, , Xiaoping Ma^1, , Zhihua Ren^1, , Liping Gou^1, ,