Aging
Navigate
Research Paper|Volume 10, Issue 6|pp 1268—1280

Age-related M1/M2 phenotype changes in circulating monocytes from healthy/unhealthy individuals

Andrea Costantini1,2, Nadia Viola2, Antonella Berretta2, Roberta Galeazzi3, Giulia Matacchione1, Jacopo Sabbatinelli1, Gianluca Storci4, Serena De Matteis5, Luca Butini2, Maria Rita Rippo1, Antonio Domenico Procopio1,6, Daniele Caraceni7, Roberto Antonicelli7, Fabiola Olivieri1,6, Massimiliano Bonafè4,5
  • 1Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, DISCLIMO, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
  • 2Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
  • 3Clinical and Molecular Laboratory, I.N.R.C.A. (Italian National Research Centre on Aging)-IRCCS, Ancona, Italy
  • 4Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy
  • 5Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
  • 6Center of Clinical Pathology and Innovative Therapy, I.N.R.C.A. (Italian National Research Centre on Aging)-IRCCS, Ancona, Italy
  • 7Department of Cardiology, I.N.R.C.A. (Italian National Research Centre on Aging)-IRCCS, Ancona, Italy

* * Equal contribution

Received: April 16, 2018Accepted: May 30, 2018Published: June 8, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Costantini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Macrophage polarization is a candidate biomarker of disease-related inflammatory status, but its modulation during aging has not been investigated. To do this, the M1/M2 profile was assessed by CD80/CD163 gating in classical (CD14++CD16-), intermediate (CD14++CD16+), and non-classical (CD14lowCD16+) monocytes from 31 healthy subjects (CTRs) of different ages. Cytofluorimetric analysis showed a significantly different CD80/CD163 distribution in the three subsets, as more than 80% of classical and intermediate monocytes were CD80+CD163+, whereas most non-classical monocytes were CD80-CD163- and CD163+. Non-classical CD163+ monocytes were significantly higher whereas classical CD163+ and CD80-CD163- monocytes significantly lower in older than younger CTRs (cut-off, 65 years), suggesting different age-related trends for M2 subsets. To establish whether an M1/M2 imbalance could be associated with disease, 21 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were compared with older CTRs. The AMI patients showed a significantly decreased proportion of CD163+CD80+ and an increased proportion of CD163+ and CD163-CD80- cells among classical monocytes, opposite trends to those observed in healthy aging. Moreover, a significantly greater proportion of intermediate and non-classical CD80+ monocytes suggested a shift to a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Overall, CD163/CD80 cytofluorimetric characterization of circulating monocytes provides additional information about their polarization and could be an innovative tool to monitor aging.