Figure 1. Clinical pathology and prognostic value of two distinct subgroups of patients divided by consistent clustering. (A) Consensus CDF in consistent clustering (k = 2–9). (B) Delta area curve of consensus clustering. (C) Consensus clustering matrix. (D–F) Differences in clinical pathology features between the two clusters. C1, cluster 1; C2, cluster 2. (G) Kaplan–Meier (K–M) survival analysis of the three subgroups. (H) Heatmap of DEG expression profiles in three subgroups.