Research Paper Volume 16, Issue 4 pp 3554—3582

Figure 3. Potential characteristics in distinct cuproptosis-related phenotypes. (A) Differences in immune score among three cuproptosis regulation patterns in merge cohort (P < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test). (B) Differences in stromal score among three cuproptosis regulation patterns in merge cohort (P < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test). (C) The fraction of TME infiltrating cell in distinct cuproptosis regulation patterns using the CIBERSORT algorithm. The bottom and top of the boxes were interquartile range of values. The thick line in the boxes indicated median value. Significant results are indicated as ^*p < 0.05, ^**p < 0.01, and ^***p < 0.001. (D) Differences of stroma-activated pathways in three cuproptosis regulation patterns. Significant results are indicated as ^*p < 0.05, ^**p < 0.01, and ^***p < 0.001.