Aging
Navigate
Research Paper|Volume 14, Issue 19|pp 7718—7733

Centenarians consistently present a younger epigenetic age than their chronological age with four epigenetic clocks based on a small number of CpG sites

Antoine Daunay1, Lise M. Hardy1,2, Yosra Bouyacoub1,2, Mourad Sahbatou1, Mathilde Touvier3, Hélène Blanché2,4, Jean-François Deleuze1,2,4,5, Alexandre How-Kit1
  • 1Laboratory for Genomics, Foundation Jean Dausset – CEPH, Paris, France
  • 2Laboratory of Excellence GenMed, Paris, France
  • 3Sorbonne Paris Nord University, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center Inserm U1153, Inrae U1125, Cnam, University of Paris (CRESS), Bobigny, France
  • 4Centre de Ressources Biologiques, CEPH Biobank, Foundation Jean Dausset – CEPH, Paris, France
  • 5Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, CEA, Institut François Jacob, Evry, France
Received: June 29, 2022Accepted: September 23, 2022Published: October 3, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 Daunay et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Aging is a progressive time-dependent biological process affecting differentially individuals, who can sometimes present exceptional longevity. Epigenetic alterations are one of the hallmarks of aging, which comprise the epigenetic drift and clock at DNA methylation level. In the present study, we estimated the DNA methylation-based age (DNAmage) using four epigenetic clocks based on a small number of CpGs in French centenarians and semi-supercentenarians (CSSC, n=214) as well as nonagenarians' and centenarians' offspring (NCO, n=143) compared to individuals from the French general population (CG, n=149). DNA methylation analysis of the nine CpGs included in the epigenetic clocks showed high correlation with chronological age (-0.66>R>0.54) and also the presence of an epigenetic drift for four CpGs that was only visible in CSSC. DNAmage analysis showed that CSSC and to a lesser extend NCO present a younger DNAmage than their chronological age (15-28.5 years for CSSC, 4.4-11.5 years for NCO and 4.2-8.2 years for CG), which were strongly significant in CSSC compared to CG (p-values<2.2e-16). These differences suggest that epigenetic aging and potentially biological aging are slowed in exceptionally long-lived individuals and that epigenetic clocks based on a small number of CpGs are sufficient to reveal alterations of the global epigenetic clock.