Aging
Navigate
Research Paper|Volume 12, Issue 19|pp 18833—18843

Sex differences in clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality among severe patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study

Wating Su1, Zhen Qiu1, Lu Zhou1, Jiabao Hou1, Yafeng Wang1, Fengnan Huang1, Yi Zhang1, Yifan Jia2, Jun Zhou2, Danyong Liu3, Zhengyuan Xia3,4, Zhong-Yuan Xia1, Shaoqing Lei1
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • 2Department of Pain Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • 3Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China
  • 4Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
* Co-first authors
Received: May 23, 2020Accepted: July 14, 2020Published: October 13, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Su et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) became a global pandemic. Males, compared to females, seem to be more susceptible to COVID-19, but related evidence is scarce, especially in severe patients. We explored sex differences in clinical characteristics and potential risk factors for mortality in severe COVID-19 patients. In this retrospective cohort study, we included all severe COVID-19 patients admitted to Eastern Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, with a definitive clinical outcome as of Apr 10, 2020. Of the included 651 patients, 332 were male, and 319 were female. Males and females did not differ in age and underlying comorbidities. Males were more likely than females to report fever and develop serious complications, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, secondary infection, acute cardiac injury, coagulopathy, acute kidney injury and arrhythmia. Further, males had much higher mortality relative to females. Multivariable regression showed neutrophilia (odds ratio 6.845, 95% CI 1.227-38.192, p=0.028), thrombocytopenia (19.488, 3.030-25.335, p=0.002), hypersensitive troponin I greater than 0.04 pg/mL (6.058, 1.545-23.755, p=0.010), and procalcitonin greater than 0.1 ng/mL (6.350, 1.396-28.882, p=0.017) on admission were associated with in-hospital death. With either of these risk factors, the cumulative survival rate was relatively lower in males than in females. In conclusion, males are more likely than females to develop serious complications and progress to death. The potential risk factors of neutrophilia, thrombocytopenia, hypersensitive troponin I greater than 0.04 pg/mL and procalcitonin more than 0.1 ng/mL may help clinicians to identify patients with poor outcomes at an early stage, especially in males.