Research Paper Volume 13, Issue 8 pp 12194—12206
CdSe/ZnS quantum dots exhibited nephrotoxicity through mediating oxidative damage and inflammatory response
- 1 Department of Nephrology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, China
- 2 Pediatrics Department, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, China
Received: January 17, 2020 Accepted: July 13, 2020 Published: November 16, 2020
https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103774How to Cite
Copyright: © 2021 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to the evaluate the nephrotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs in vitro and vivo, as well as investigate the underlying toxicity mechanisms.
Results: In vitro experiments showed that compared with control cells, CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment significantly inhibited cell viability and promoted cell apoptosis in dose-dependent manner in NRK cells. Notably, CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment increased the contents of MDA and ROS, and decreased the activities of SOD, CAT and GSH-Px; however, the co-treatment of NAC and QDs relieved the oxidative damage of NRK cells. Moreover, in vivo experiments also revealed that CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment obviously increased kidney weight coefficient, damaged the kidney function, as well as induced inflammatory response and inhibited the activation of NRF2/Keap1 pathway in kidney tissues of mice.
Conclusions: CdSe/ZnS QDs exhibited obvious nephrotoxicity by mediating oxidative damage and inflammatory response in vitro and in vivo via NRF2/Keap1 pathway.
Methods: The characterization of CdSe/ZnS QDs was analyzed by transmission electron microscope, emission spectrum scanning, and dynamic light scattering. Rat kidney cells (NRK) were exposed to different doses of CdSe/ZnS QDs with or without N-acetylcysteine (NAC, antioxidant). Then, cellular uptake of CdSe/ZnS QDs was detected, and in vitro cytotoxicity was evaluated by MTT assay and TUNEL assay.
Introduction
In recent years, nanomaterials have been reported to be promising functional materials and display great application values in various fields, including materials, information, energy and biomedicine [1]. However, the attendant potential risks, such as human exposure and environmental contamination, have limited the expanding commercial applications of several nanomaterials [2]. Notably, quantum dots (QDs) as one class of nanomaterials have attracted tremendous attentions due to its unique structural and mechanical properties [3]. QDs are fluorescent semiconductor nanocrystals consisting of group II-VI or III-V elements, characterized with the property of narrow and sharp emission spectra as well as broad excitation spectra [4]. Currently, QDs have been extensively applied in biomedical fields, including cellular imaging [5] and drug delivery [6]. Especially, QDs facilitate to uncover cellular processes by imaging, and are used as a tool of immunodetection during basic biomedical research [7, 8]. In addition, QDs can be applied for the development of highly sensitive cancer diagnostic system [9, 10]. Unfortunately, despite the biological effects of QDs have been proved, the toxicity and safety remain serious issues [11]. The most popular QDs, such as CdS, CdTe, and CdSe, are cadmium (Cd)-based QDs, while Cd possesses high toxicity and carcinogenicity to liver [12, 13]. It has been revealed that QDs can be oxidized after entering into cells, which lead to the release of Cd into cell environment [14]. However, few studies have investigated the nephrotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs.
In the present study, the characterization of CdSe/ZnS QDs was first measured. Afterwards, the nephrotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs was evaluated in vitro and in vivo experiments, and the potential mechanism was further investigated.
Results
Characterization of CdSe/ZnS QDs
As shown in Figure 1A, TEM showed that solubilized CdSe/ZnS QDs was monodisperse with the small size distribution (Figure 1A). Accordingly, CdSe/ZnS QDs by emission spectrum scanning revealed the fluorescence maximum at about 550 nm (Figure 1B). In addition, DLS showed the excellent homogeneity with the similar size of around 10 nm at 0 and 24 h (Figure 1C-E), which suggested the stability of CdSe/ZnS QDs.
Figure 1. Characterization of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots (QDs). (A) The morphologies of CdSe/ZnS QDs by transmission electron microscopy. (B) The emission spectrum scanning of CdSe/ZnS QDs. (C) The zeta potential analyses and dynamic light scattering plots of CdSe/ZnS QDs cultured in DMEM for 0 (D) and 24 h (E).
Effect of CdSe/ZnS QDs on cytotoxicity in NRK cells
Cytotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs was evaluated by MTT assay and TUNEL assay. MTT assay showed that CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment significantly inhibited cell viability of NRK cells in a dose-dependent manner both at 24 and 48 h (Figure 2A). Consistently, compared control cells, TUNEL-stained cells were obviously increased in a dose-dependent manner after NRK cells treated with CdSe/ZnS QDs both at 24 and 48 h (Figure 2B). These results suggested CdSe/ZnS QDs exhibited toxicity to NRK cells.
Figure 2. CdSe/ZnS QDs exhibited toxicity to NRK cells. (A) Cell viability of NRK cells treated with different doses of CdSe/ZnS QDs at 24 and 48 h using MTT assay. (B) Cell apoptosis of NRK cells treated with different doses of CdSe/ZnS QDs at 24 and 48 h using TUNEL staining. *P < 0.05 vs. 10 nM group or control group.
Cellular uptake of CdSe/ZnS QDs in NRK cells
Based on confocal imaging analysis, we found the enhanced fluorescence intensity when cells were treated with CdSe/ZnS QDs compared with control cells; meanwhile, the fluorescence intensity was increased in time-dependent manner (Figure 3). These results indicated the high cellular uptake of CdSe/ZnS QDs in NRK cells.
Figure 3. Cellular uptake of CdSe/ZnS QDs in NRK cells. Confocal images of NRK cells treated with 40 nM of CdSe/ZnS QDs for 0, 1, 4, 12, and 24 h.
Effect of CdSe/ZnS QDs on oxidative damage in NRK cells
Compared with control cells, CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment significantly increased MDA content and ROS content, while decreased the activities of SOD, CAT and GSH-Px in NRK cells (p < 0.05, Figure 4A, 4B). However, the co-treatment of NAC and CdSe/ZnS QDs exhibited lower contents of MDA and ROS, as well as elevated activities of SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px compared with the single CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment (p < 0.05, Figure 4A, 4B). These data suggested that CdSe/ZnS QDs induced oxidative damage in NRK cells.
Figure 4. CdSe/ZnS QDs induced oxidative damage in NRK cells. (A) Measurements of several oxidative damage indicators, including malondialdehyde (MDA), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), in NRK cells treated with CdSe/ZnS QDs and/or N-acetylcysteine (NAC, antioxidant) using the commercial kits. (B) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) content in NRK cells treated with CdSe/ZnS QDs and/or NAC using the commercial kit. *P < 0.05 vs. control group; #P < 0.05 vs. CdSe/ZnS group.
Effect of CdSe/ZnS QDs on kidney function in vivo
The toxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs was explored in kidney tissues of mice. The kidney weight coefficient was significantly increased after CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment, while the addition of NAC reduced the kidney weight coefficient (Figure 5A). In addition, the biochemical indicators of renal function were measured, and the results revealed that CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment remarkably inhibited the contents of UA, Cr, and BUN (p < 0.05), as well as reduced the contents of Ca and P while without significant difference (Figure 5B). However, the addition of NAC partly reversed the contents of UA, Cr, BUN, Ca and P induced by CdSe/ZnS QDs (Figure 5B).
Figure 5. CdSe/ZnS QDs caused kidney disorder in mice. (A) The kidney weight coefficient of mice after CdSe/ZnS QDs and/or N-acetylcysteine (NAC, antioxidant) injection. (B) Measurements of biochemical indicators of renal function, including uric acid (UA), urea nitrogen (BUN), creatine (Cr), calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P), using clinical automatic chemistry analyzer. *P < 0.05 vs. control group; #P < 0.05 vs. CdSe/ZnS group.
Effect of CdSe/ZnS QDs on inflammatory response in vivo
We also detected the expression of inflammatory cytokines to evaluate the toxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs to kidney tissues of mice. qRT-PCR revealed that CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment conspicuously increased the mRNA levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-18, IL-10, IL-8, IL-6, INF-γ, TGF-β, CRP, MIF, TNF-α, NF-kB, and CYP1A1, while decreased the mRNA level of HSP70 (p < 0.05, Figure 6A). However, the co-treatment of NAC and CdSe/ZnS QDs exhibited lower mRNA levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-18, IL-10, IL-8, IL-6, INF-γ, TGF-β, CRP, MIF, TNF-α, NF-kB, and CYP1A1, as well as higher mRNA level of HSP70 compared with the single CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment (p < 0.05, Figure 6A). Similarly, ELISA results revealed that the protein expression of these inflammatory cytokines emerged the consistent expression trend compared with the results of qRT-PCR (Figure 6B).
Figure 6. CdSe/ZnS QDs induced inflammatory response in mice. (A) The mRNA levels of inflammatory cytokines, including nuclear transcription factor-kB (NF-kB), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, IL-1β, C-reactive protein (CRP), transforming growth factor (TGF-β), interferon (INF-γ), cytochrome P450 1A (CYP 1A1) and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), in kidney tissues of mice after CdSe/ZnS QDs and/or N-acetylcysteine (NAC, antioxidant) injection by qRT-PCR. (B) The protein levels of these inflammatory cytokines by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. *P < 0.05 vs. control group; #P < 0.05 vs. CdSe/ZnS group.
Effect of CdSe/ZnS QDs on Nrf2/KEAP1 pathway in vivo
It is well-known that oxidative damage was associated with NRF2/KEAP1 pathway, thus, the key genes related to NRF2/KEAP1 pathway were detected. RT-PCR analysis showed that CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment remarkably decreased the mRNA levels of NRF2, HO-1, GCLC, and GST, and increased the mRNA level of Keap1 compared with control cells (p < 0.01, Figure 7A), while the addition of NAC partly reversed the mRNA levels of NRF2, HO-1, GCLC, GST, and Keap1 compared to cells treated with CdSe/ZnS QDs (p < 0.05, Figure 7A). In addition, ELISA also revealed that compared with control cells, the protein levels of NRF2, HO-1, GCLC, and GST were obviously reduced, and the protein level of Keap1 was elevated (p < 0.01, Figure 7B). However, the co-treatment of NAC and CdSe/ZnS QDs promoted the protein levels of NRF2, HO-1, GCLC, and GST as well as suppressed the protein level of Keap1 compared with the single CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment in kidney tissues of mice (p < 0.05, Figure 7B).
Figure 7. CdSe/ZnS QDs inhibited the activation of Nrf2/Keap1 pathway in vivo. (A) The mRNA levels of Nrf2/KEAP1 pathway related genes, including Nrf2, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1), heme oxygenase (HO-1), glutamate cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC), glutathione S-transferase (GST), in kidney tissues of mice after CdSe/ZnS QDs and/or N-acetylcysteine (NAC, antioxidant) injection by qRT-PCR. (B) The protein levels of these Nrf2/KEAP1 pathway related proteins by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. *P < 0.05 vs. control group; #P < 0.05 vs. CdSe/ZnS group.
Discussion
An exceptional array of physicochemical properties have attracted the attention of many researchers to explore the biomedical applications of QDs, while the following security concerns are raised. To date, the nephrotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs has not been well investigated, and the underlying toxicity mechanisms also should be further understood. In the current study, in vitro experiments showed that compared with control cells, CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment significantly inhibited cell viability and promoted cell apoptosis with the increasing dose in NRK cells. Notably, CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment increased the contents of MDA and ROS, decreased the activities of SOD, CAT and GSH-Px in NRK cells; however, the co-treatment of NAC and QDs relieved the oxidative damage of NRK cells. Moreover, in vivo experiments also revealed that CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment obviously increased kidney weight coefficient, damaged the kidney function, as well as induced inflammatory response in kidney tissues of mice, while the addition of NAC alleviated renal injury and inflammatory response. Furthermore, NRF2/KEAP1 pathway was inhibited by CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment, which might be associated with the nephrotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs.
Considerable evidence has demonstrated that CdSe/ZnS QDs can be widely used for various biological and biomedical applications due to its unique physiochemical properties. However, the toxicity and safety of CdSe/ZnS QDs on the human health are still considered as key factors in biomedical applications. Cytotoxicity studies of CdSe/ZnS QDs have been conducted in several in vitro experiments. Peng et al. [15] have demonstrated that CdSe/ZnS QDs are able to suppress cell viability in HepG2 cells, while CdSe/ZnS QDs with a dose > 100 nM exerts significant cytotoxicity. Also, Manshian et al. [16] have evaluated the toxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs in different cell type, including lymphoblastoid (TK6), fibroblast (HFF-1), and epithelial cells (BEAS-2B), and the results exhibits the cytotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs to HFF-1 and TK6 cells, suggesting cell type-dependent variation in the cytotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs. Several studies report that CdSe/ZnS QDs exhibit obvious cytotoxicity in cancer cells, such as pancreatic cancer cells [17] and lung adenocarcinoma cells [18]. Similarly, our study also revealed that CdSe/ZnS QDs treatment inhibited cell viability and promoted cell apoptosis in NRK cells, as well as damaged the kidney function in mice, which suggested the nephrotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs in vitro and in vivo.
Furthermore, this study investigated the mechanism of the nephrotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs in vitro and in vivo. Oxidative damage is reported to play major role in cytotoxicity [19]. It is well-known that over-production of ROS can influence the stability of DNA and RNA, and decrease the activities of SOD, CAT and GSH-Px as well as increase MDA content, thereby resulting in cell oxidative damage [20]. Li et al. [21] have reported that CdS QDs treatment significantly increases ROS level, decreases GSH activity, and induces Cd2+ release, which is considered to responsible for the cytotoxicity of CdS QDs. Also, Luo et al. [22] have shown that Cd-based QDs can induce oxidative stress by increasing the production of ROS in renal adenocarcinoma cells. In this study, we found that CdSe/ZnS QDs increased the contents of MDA and ROS, as well as decreased the activities of SOD, CAT and GSH-Px, as well as lowered the mitochondrial membrane potential in NRK cells. Additionally, inflammatory response is also reported to be closely implicated in nephrotoxicity [23], the anti-inflammation drug development has been focused [24, 25]. Notably, it has been proved that CdSe/ZnS QDs can induce liver inflammation through activating NLRP3 inflammasome [26]. This study revealed that CdSe/ZnS QDs increased the productions of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-18, IL-10, IL-8, IL-6, INF-γ, TGF-β, CRP, MIF, TNF-α, NF-kB, and CYP1A1, and decreased the expression of HSP70 in kidney tissues of mice. This study further found that the co-treatment of CdSe/ZnS QDs and NAC alleviated oxidative damage and inflammatory response. It is well-known that NAC as antioxidant has been reported to exert inhibiting effects on oxidative stress and inflammatory response [27, 28]. Consistently, previous studies have demonstrated that NAC exerts inhibiting effect on nephrotoxicity [29–31]. Thus, these results indicated that CdSe/ZnS QDs might induce the nephrotoxicity through inducing oxidative damage and promoting inflammatory response.
Interestingly, our in vivo results revealed that CdSe/ZnS treatment inhibited the activation of Nrf2/Keap1 pathway, while which was partly activated by NAC. It has been reported that NRF2/Keap1 signaling pathway plays a critical role during oxidative damage [32]. Under the physiological state, NRF2 is combined with Keap1 in the cytoplasm; however, in the stress state, NRF2 is dissociated from Keap1 and transported into the nucleus, thereby activating the expression of anti-oxidants (such as HO-1, GCLC, and GST) [33]. In addition, the activation of NRF2/Keap1 signaling pathway can promote inflammatory response [34]. Together with these findings, our results indicated that CdSe/ZnS QDs might exert obvious nephrotoxicity via NRF2/Keap1 pathway.
In conclusion, findings from this study revealed that CdSe/ZnS QDs exhibited nephrotoxicity by mediating oxidative stress and inflammatory response in vitro and in vivo, which was closely related to NRF2/Keap1 pathway.
Materials and Methods
Characterization of CdSe/ZnS QDs
Water-soluble CdSe/ZnS QDs were purchased from Ocean Nanotech (USA). The characterization of CdSe/ZnS QDs were observed by transmission electron microscope (TEM), emission spectrum scanning, and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Briefly, 8 μM of CdSe/ZnS QDs solution was diluted 20-fold with PBS buffer, and then 10 μL of the sample was dripped onto a carbon-coated copper mesh. After water evaporation, the sample was observed by TEM (Tecnai G2 20 S-TWIN, FEI, Eindhoven, Netherlands). For emission spectrum scanning, 8 μM of CdSe/ZnS QDs solution was diluted to a concentration of 10 nM with PBS buffer. Next, 200 uL of the sample was added into 96-well plate, and detected using M200 multifunctional fluorescence microplate reader at the excitation wavelength of 450 nm and the end wavelength of 750 nm. For DLS, 10 nM of CdSe/ZnS QDs was cultured in DMEM for 0 and 24 h, then detected by Zetasizer Nano Z (Worcestershire, UK) at 0 and 24 h, respectively.
Cell culture and treatment
Rat kidney cells (NRK) were provided by Shanghai Obio (China), and maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco) with 10% FBS under 5% CO2 and 37°C. NRK cells were exposed to different doses of CdSe/ZnS QDs with or without N-acetylcysteine (NAC, antioxidant, provided by Sigma).
Thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay
To evaluate the cytotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS QDs, NRK cells were cultured in 96-well plates. On the next day, cells were then incubated with different doses (10, 20, 40, 80, 160 nM) of CdSe/ZnS QDs, respectively, for 24 h and 48 h. Next, MTT (10 μL, Sigma, St Louis, MI, USA) was added to incubate with cells for 4 h, and dimethyl sulfoxide (150 μL, Sigma) was then used to dissolve formazan precipitates. Microplate spectrophotometer was used to evaluate cell viability based on the absorbances at 450 nm.
The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase d UTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay
NRK cells were incubated with different doses (10, 20, 40, 80, 160 nM) of CdSe/ZnS QDs for 24 h and 48 h, respectively. Then, cells were fixed and stained with TUNEL according to the producer’s guideline. Followed by TUNEL staining, DAPI was used for staining nuclei. TUNEL-positive cells were photographed and observed by fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Cellular uptake of CdSe/ZnS QDs
Cellular uptake of CdSe/ZnS QDs was evaluated using confocal imaging analysis. Briefly, NRK cells (2.5 × 104) were grown in 24-well plates for 24 h, and then incubated with 40 nM of CdSe/ZnS QDs for 1, 4, 12 and 24 h, respectively. After washed with PBS, cells were stained with Heochst33342 for 10 min, and then observed using confocal fluorescence microscope.
Measurements of oxidative damage indicators
Oxidative damage indicators, including malondialdehyde (MDA), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected in NRK cells treated with 40 nM of CdSe/ZnS QDs and/or 10 μM of NAC for 12 h. MDA content, CAT activity, SOD activity, and GSH-Px activity in cells and tissues were determined using commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng, Nanjing, China). Meanwhile, ROS contents in cells and tissues were also determined using DCFH-DA (Beyotime, Beijing, China). The cells were observed under inverted microscope (Olympus, Japan), and fluorescent density was calculated.
Animal experiments
Approval from the local animal Ethics Committee of the animal laboratory center was obtained prior to experiments. Followed by one week of acclimation, a total of 30 healthy mice were used for the in vivo study. Thirty mice were randomly and equally assigned into 3 groups: control group, CdSe/ZnS group, and CdSe/ZnS + NAC group. Mice in the CdSe/ZnS group were injected with 50 mg/kg of CdSe/ZnS QDs via tail vein, while mice in the CdSe/ZnS + NAC group received 50 mg/kg of CdSe/ZnS QDs via intravenous injection and 100 mg/kg/day of NAC via intraperitoneal injection. After 14 days of injection, mice were euthanized, and the kidney tissues were collected. Kidney weight coefficient was measured as following: kidney wet weight (g)/body weight (g)*100. Furthermore, the biochemical indicators of renal function, including calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), creatine (Cr), urea nitrogen (BUN), and uric acid (UA), were measured by automatic chemistry analyzer (Hitachi, Japan).
RNA extraction, reverse transcription and real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was obtained from kidney tissues by Trizol, and then PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) was applied to obtain cDNA by reverse transcription of RNA. The qRT-PCR was carried out by the SYBR Premix Ex Taq TM II (Takara). The PCR primers for various inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, IL-1β, cytochrome P450 1A (CYP 1A1), transforming growth factor (TGF-β), interferon (INF-γ), C-reactive protein (CRP), macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), nuclear transcription factor-kB (NF-kB), and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), as well as Nrf2/KEAP1 pathway related genes, including Nrf2, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1), heme oxygenase (HO-1), glutamate cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and β-actin, are shown in Table 1. β-actin were served as the internal control, and mRNA expression data was evaluated by 2-ΔΔCt method.
Table 1. Primers used for the qRT-PCR.
| Gene | Primer sequence | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NF-kB | F: 5′-CCTCTACACATAGCGGCTGG-3′ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5′-GCACCTTGGGATGCGTTTTT-3′ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TNF-α | F: 5'-CTCCCTCCAGAAAAGACACCAT-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-ATCACCCCGAAGTTCAGTAGACAG-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MIF | F: 5'-CGGACCGGGTCTACATCAAC-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-GAACAGCGGTGCAGGTAAGTG-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IL-2 | F: 5'-GCCCCAAGGGCTCAAAAATG-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-GCGCTTACTTTGTGCTGTCC-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IL-4 | F: 5'-ACTGCACAGCAGTTCCACAG-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-CTCTGGTTGGCTTCCTTCAC-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IL-6 | F: 5'-CAGAAGGAGTGGCTAAGGACCA-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-ACGCACTAGGTTTGCCGAGTAG-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IL-8 | F: 5'-ATGACTTCCAAGCTGGCCGTGGCT-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-TCTCAGCCCTCTTCAAAAACTTCTC-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IL-10 | F: 5'-GGACTTTAAGGGTTACTTGG-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-TCACCCAGGGAATTCAAATG-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IL-18 | F: 5'-GACCTTCCAGATCGCTTCCTC-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-GATGCAATTGTCTTCTACTGGTTC-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IL-1β | F: 5'-GCACGATGCACCTGTACGAT-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-AGACATCACCAAGCTTTTTGCT-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CRP | F: 5'-GTCTGCTACGGGGATTGTAGA-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-CACCGCCATACGAGTCCTG-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TGF-β | F: 5'-TCCCCCGAGAGGCAGATC-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-ATCGAGATGAGCGCTCTCTGA-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INF-γ | F: 5'-GGAACCCTCTCCCTTCAATGT-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-CTCCACAATAGCCTTCAGTGC-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CYP1A1 | F: 5'-CCTCTTTGGAGCTGGGTTT-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-AGGCTCCACGAGATAGCAGT-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HSP70 | F: 5'-CAGACGCAGACCTTCACTAC-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-TTTTGTCCTGCTCGCTAATC-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nrf2 | F: 5'-CTTTTGGCGCAGACATTCC-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-AAGACTGGGCTCTCGATGTG-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Keap1 | F: 5'-CAACTTCGCTGAGCAGATTGGC-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-TGATGAGGGTCACCAGTTGGCA-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HO-1 | F: 5'-CGCCTTCCTGCTCAACATT-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-TGTGTTCCTCTGTCAGCATCAC-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GCLC | F: 5'-GGAGGAGAGAGAGGCCTGGA-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-ATCGATGGTCAGGTCGATGT-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GST | F: 5'-GCTCTTACCACGTGCAGCTT-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-GGCTGGGAAGAGGAAATGGA-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| β-actin | F: 5'-GCTCCTCCTGTTCGACAGTCA-3' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R: 5'-ACCTTCCATGGTGTCTGA-3' | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NF-kB, nuclear transcription factor-kB; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; IL-2, interleukin-2; CRP, C-reactive protein; TGF-β, transforming growth factor; INF-γ, interferon; CYP 1A1, cytochrome P450 1A; HSP70, heat shock protein 70; Keap1, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1; HO-1, heme oxygenase; GCLC, glutamate cysteine ligase catalytic subunit; and GST, glutathione S-transferase. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
The kidney tissues homogenate was obtained, followed by centrifugation for 15 min at 4°C. Next, the supernatant was detected by commercial ELISA kit (Boster, Wuhan, China) for the contents of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-18, IL-10, IL-8, IL-6, INF-γ, TGF-β, CRP, MIF, TNF-α, NF-kB, CYP1A1, HSP70, Nrf2, Keap1, HO-1, GCLC and GST as described by the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
Data were presented as the mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison was used for data comparisons based on SPSS software. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Author Contributions
Xiuli Li and Huiwu Zhang contributed to the study design and reviewed the munascript. Fuyun Sun analyzed the data and writing of the manuscript. Xiuli Li and Fuyun Sun contributed to the data collection, data interpretation and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Editorial Note
This corresponding author has a verified history of publications using the personal email address for correspondence.
References
- 1. Guozhong C. Nanostructures and nanomaterials: synthesis, properties and applications. Imperial College Press; 2004.
- 2. Valsami-Jones E, Lynch I. NANOSAFETY. How safe are nanomaterials? Science. 2015; 350:388–89. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad0768 [PubMed]
- 3. Medintz IL, Uyeda HT, Goldman ER, Mattoussi H. Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing. Nat Mater. 2005; 4:435–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1390 [PubMed]
- 4. Jacak L, Hawrylak P, Wójs A. Quantum dots. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
- 5. Bilan R, Fleury F, Nabiev I, Sukhanova A. Quantum dot surface chemistry and functionalization for cell targeting and imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2015; 26:609–24. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00069 [PubMed]
- 6. Montenegro JM, Grazu V, Sukhanova A, Agarwal S, de la Fuente JM, Nabiev I, Greiner A, Parak WJ. Controlled antibody/(bio-) conjugation of inorganic nanoparticles for targeted delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013; 65:677–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.12.003 [PubMed]
- 7. Smith AM, Ruan G, Rhyner MN, Nie S. Engineering luminescent quantum dots for in vivo molecular and cellular imaging. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006; 34:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-9000-9 [PubMed]
- 8. Sukhanova A, Even-Desrumeaux K, Kisserli A, Tabary T, Reveil B, Millot JM, Chames P, Baty D, Artemyev M, Oleinikov V, Pluot M, Cohen JH, Nabiev I. Oriented conjugates of single-domain antibodies and quantum dots: toward a new generation of ultrasmall diagnostic nanoprobes. Nanomedicine. 2012; 8:516–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2011.07.007 [PubMed]
- 9. Kairdolf BA, Smith AM, Stokes TH, Wang MD, Young AN, Nie S. Semiconductor quantum dots for bioimaging and biodiagnostic applications. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2013; 6:143–62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-060908-155136 [PubMed]
- 10. Brazhnik K, Sokolova Z, Baryshnikova M, Bilan R, Efimov A, Nabiev I, Sukhanova A. Quantum dot-based lab-on-a-bead system for multiplexed detection of free and total prostate-specific antigens in clinical human serum samples. Nanomedicine. 2015; 11:1065–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2015.03.003 [PubMed]
- 11. Bottrill M, Green M. Some aspects of quantum dot toxicity. Chem Commun (Camb). 2011; 47:7039–50. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc10692a [PubMed]
- 12. Chen N, He Y, Su Y, Li X, Huang Q, Wang H, Zhang X, Tai R, Fan C. The cytotoxicity of cadmium-based quantum dots. Biomaterials. 2012; 33:1238–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.070 [PubMed]
- 13. Liu W, Zhang S, Wang L, Qu C, Zhang C, Hong L, Yuan L, Huang Z, Wang Z, Liu S, Jiang G. CdSe quantum dot (QD)-induced morphological and functional impairments to liver in mice. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e24406. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024406 [PubMed]
- 14. Derfus AM, Chan WC, Bhatia SN. Probing the cytotoxicity of semiconductor quantum dots. Nano Lett. 2004; 4:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0347334 [PubMed]
- 15. Peng L, He M, Chen B, Wu Q, Zhang Z, Pang D, Zhu Y, Hu B. Cellular uptake, elimination and toxicity of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in HepG2 cells. Biomaterials. 2013; 34:9545–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.038 [PubMed]
- 16. Manshian BB, Soenen SJ, Al-Ali A, Brown A, Hondow N, Wills J, Jenkins GJ, Doak SH. Cell type-dependent changes in CdSe/ZnS quantum dot uptake and toxic endpoints. Toxicol Sci. 2015; 144:246–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfv002 [PubMed]
- 17. He SJ, Cao J, Li YS, Yang JC, Zhou M, Qu CY, Zhang Y, Shen F, Chen Y, Li MM, Xu LM. CdSe/ZnS quantum dots induce photodynamic effects and cytotoxicity in pancreatic cancer cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22:5012–22. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i21.5012 [PubMed]
- 18. Choi YJ, Kim YJ, Lee JW, Lee Y, Lim YB, Chung HW. Cyto-/genotoxic effect of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in human lung adenocarcinoma cells for potential photodynamic UV therapy applications. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2012; 12:2160–68. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2012.5781 [PubMed]
- 19. Ahamed M, Akhtar MJ, Khan MA, Alrokayan SA, Alhadlaq HA. Oxidative stress mediated cytotoxicity and apoptosis response of bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) nanoparticles in human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells. Chemosphere. 2019; 216:823–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.214 [PubMed]
- 20. Schieber M, Chandel NS. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr Biol. 2014; 24:R453–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.034 [PubMed]
- 21. Li KG, Chen JT, Bai SS, Wen X, Song SY, Yu Q, Li J, Wang YQ. Intracellular oxidative stress and cadmium ions release induce cytotoxicity of unmodified cadmium sulfide quantum dots. Toxicol In Vitro. 2009; 23:1007–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2009.06.020 [PubMed]
- 22. Luo YH, Wu SB, Wei YH, Chen YC, Tsai MH, Ho CC, Lin SY, Yang CS, Lin P. Cadmium-based quantum dot induced autophagy formation for cell survival via oxidative stress. Chem Res Toxicol. 2013; 26:662–73. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx300455k [PubMed]
- 23. González-Guerrero C, Cannata-Ortiz P, Guerri C, Egido J, Ortiz A, Ramos AM. TLR4-mediated inflammation is a key pathogenic event leading to kidney damage and fibrosis in cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Arch Toxicol. 2017; 91:1925–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-016-1830-8 [PubMed]
- 24. Kou Y, Koag MC, Cheun Y, Shin A, Lee S. Application of hypoiodite-mediated aminyl radical cyclization to synthesis of solasodine acetate. Steroids. 2012; 77:1069–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2012.05.002 [PubMed]
- 25. Kou Y, Cheun Y, Koag MC, Lee S. Synthesis of 14',15'-dehydro-ritterazine Y via reductive and oxidative functionalizations of hecogenin acetate. Steroids. 2013; 78:304–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2012.10.021 [PubMed]
- 26. Lu Y, Xu S, Chen H, He M, Deng Y, Cao Z, Pi H, Chen C, Li M, Ma Q, Gao P, Ji Y, Zhang L, et al. CdSe/ZnS quantum dots induce hepatocyte pyroptosis and liver inflammation via NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Biomaterials. 2016; 90:27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.003 [PubMed]
- 27. Pan X, Wu X, Yan D, Peng C, Rao C, Yan H. Acrylamide-induced oxidative stress and inflammatory response are alleviated by n-acetylcysteine in PC12 cells: involvement of the crosstalk between Nrf2 and NF-κB pathways regulated by MAPKs. Toxicol Lett. 2018; 288:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.02.002 [PubMed]
- 28. Bastin AJ, Davies N, Lim E, Quinlan GJ, Griffiths MJ. Systemic inflammation and oxidative stress post-lung resection: effect of pretreatment with n-acetylcysteine. Respirology. 2016; 21:180–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.12662 [PubMed]
- 29. Cui J, Tang L, Hong Q, Lin S, Sun X, Cai G, Bai XY, Chen X. N-acetylcysteine ameliorates gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity by enhancing autophagy and reducing oxidative damage in miniature pigs. Shock. 2019; 52:622–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000001319 [PubMed]
- 30. Güntürk I, Yazici C, Köse SK, Dağli F, Yücel B, Yay AH. The effect of n-acetylcysteine on inflammation and oxidative stress in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity: a rat model. Turk J Med Sci. 2019; 49:1789–99. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1903-225 [PubMed]
- 31. Abdel-Wahab WM, Moussa FI, Saad NA. Synergistic protective effect of N-acetylcysteine and taurine against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017; 11:901–08. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S131316 [PubMed]
- 32. Bellezza I, Giambanco I, Minelli A, Donato R. Nrf2-Keap1 signaling in oxidative and reductive stress. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2018; 1865:721–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.02.010 [PubMed]
- 33. Liufang H, Wang Y, Ren R, Huo H, Sun J, Hongmei L, Zhu Y, Tan Y. Anti-oxidative stress actions and regulation mechanisms of Keap1-Nrf2/ARE signal pathway. Journal of International Pharmaceutical Research. 2016; 43:146–66. https://doi.org/10.13220/j.cnki.jipr.2016.01.022
- 34. Arellano-Buendía AS, Tostado-González M, García-Arroyo FE, Cristóbal-García M, Loredo-Mendoza ML, Tapia E, Sánchez-Lozada LG, Osorio-Alonso H. Anti-inflammatory therapy modulates Nrf2-Keap1 in kidney from rats with diabetes. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016; 2016:4693801. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4693801 [PubMed]