Aging
Navigate
Research Paper|Volume 10, Issue 12|pp 3761—3773

DNA methylation-based age prediction and telomere length in white blood cells and cumulus cells of infertile women with normal or poor response to ovarian stimulation

Scott J. Morin1,2, Xin Tao3, Diego Marin1,2, Yiping Zhan3, Jessica Landis3, Jenna Bedard3, Richard T. Scott Jr.1,2, Emre Seli1,4
  • 1IVIRMA New Jersey, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920, USA
  • 2Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
  • 3Foundation for Embryonic Competence, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920, USA
  • 4Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
Received: October 5, 2018Accepted: November 15, 2018Published: December 8, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Morin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

An algorithm assessing the methylation levels of 353 informative CpG sites in the human genome permits accurate prediction of the chronologic age of a subject. Interestingly, when there is discrepancy between the predicted age and chronologic age (age acceleration or “AgeAccel”), patients are at risk for morbidity and mortality. Identification of infertile patients at risk for accelerated reproductive senescence may permit preventative action. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the “epigenetic clock” concept in reproductive age women undergoing fertility treatment by applying the age prediction algorithm in peripheral (white blood cells [WBCs]) and follicular somatic cells (cumulus cells [CCs]), and to identify whether women with premature reproductive aging (diminished ovarian reserve) were at risk of AgeAccel in their age prediction. Results indicated that the epigenetic algorithm accurately predicts age when applied to WBCs but not to CCs. The age prediction of CCs was substantially younger than chronologic age regardless of the patient’s age or response to stimulation. In addition, telomeres of CCs were significantly longer than that of WBCs. Our findings suggest that CCs do not demonstrate changes in methylome-predicted age or telomere-length in association with increasing female age or ovarian response to stimulation.