The stress polarity pathway: AMPK 'GIV'-es protection against metabolic insults

The stress-polarity pathway, a special force that resists junctional collapse during energetic stress

Besides the pathways mentioned above, regulation of polarity requires an additional signaling component which is triggered exclusively under conditions of energetic stress. Three studies [6-8] published in 2006-07 simultaneously reported a surprising role of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in the maintenance of epithelial cell polarity and barrier functions (Figure 1). Discovered in 1984 [9-12], and named subsequently in 1988 [13], AMPK is unique in that it is a metabolic sensor protein which is activated exclusively during energetic stress. It is because of its ability to couple energy sensing to cell polarity, activation of AMPK was critical for protecting cell junctions against stress-induced collapse. Using polarized epithelial [Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK)] cells it was demonstrated that AMPK is activated during calcium (Ca²⁺)-induced tight junction (TJ) assembly [6,7]. The catalytic activity of AMPK is critical because either depletion of the AMPK catalytic α-subunit or expression of a kinase-dead mutant of AMPK inhibits TJ assembly as indicated by a loss of transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER); the latter is a measure of paracellular ion flow which depends on TJ stability. Pharmacological activation of AMPK with 5-aminoimidizole-4-carboxamide riboside (AICAR) partially protects TJs despite Ca²⁺ depletion [6,7]. These findings closely followed another major revelation that the tumor suppressor LKB1 (Liver Kinase B1; also known as Serine/Threonine Kinase 11 - STK11) is a direct activator of AMPK [14-17], and that defects in cell polarity precede the development of tumors [pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma] in genetically modified mice with tissue-specific deletion of LKB1 [18]. Together, these discoveries established the first links between energetic stress, cell polarity and oncogenesis. Since then, multiple studies (summarized in Figure 1) have reported the protective role of AMPK in maintaining cell-cell junctions across a variety of cell types in diverse tissues [airway and lungs [19,20], heart [21], the blood-brain barrier [22,23], kidney [24], intestine [25-29], liver [30]] while mounting a pathologic response to a variety of stressors, from bacterial invasion [31] to ischemia [24].

Figure 1. Clinical and pathologic significance of the protective role of AMPK in the epithelium during stress. Schematic showing the time line of publications on the topic of AMPK and cell-cell junctions, as determined by a PubMed search in 2016, and their relationship to the recently published work by Aznar et al. [34]. Top: Clinical and pathological significance of pharmacologic activation of AMPK, either by the widely prescribed anti-diabetic drug, Metformin (green) or by other nutritional / dietary supplements (grey) in the regulation of tight junction stability and function. Bottom: Time line of publications unraveling the role of AMPK in the regulation of epithelial tight junctions and in the establishment of cell polarity.

Although there is a wide consensus on the role of the LKB1-AMPK axis, and in particular AMPK's role in reinforcing TJs and preserving cell polarity during adverse environmental changes, how this kinase actually accomplishes this task, apparently in a Ca²⁺-independent manner [32], remained largely unknown until recently. One study suggested that muscle myosin regulatory light chain (MRLC) may be the effector of AMPK during energetic stress in the fly [8], but those findings have since come into question [33] because the phosphosites on MRLC do not conform to the optimal AMPK substrate motif found in all other established in vivo AMPK substrates. Thus, even though it had been a decade since the first studies revealed AMPK's ability to preserve the epithelial architecture and function in the setting of energetic stress, effectors of AMPK that orchestrate these functions had not been identified.

The polarity scaffold, GIV, is a novel substrate and effector of AMPK within the stress polarity pathway

A recent study [34] demonstrated that GIV (G-alpha interacting vesicle associated protein, a.k.a. Girdin), a multimodular polarity scaffold protein is a novel substrate of AMPK, and defined the molecular mechanisms by which the AMPK-GIV signaling axis protects the epithelium by stabilizing TJs and preserving cell polarity when challenged with energetic stress. GIV, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for trimeric G proteins, had previously been shown to serve as a polarity scaffold protein that regulates epithelial cell polarity and morphogenesis [35-37]. GIV’s role at cell-cell junctions has been attributed to its ability to assemble various functional complexes with its C-terminus, e.g., (i) binding the Par3/Par6/aPKC polarity complex [36,38]; (ii) binding and modulating the endocytic trafficking of E-cadherin [39]; (iii) linking cadherin-catenin complexes to the actin cytoskeleton [37]; and finally, (iv) binding and activating G protein, Gαi via its GEF motif and maintaining epithelial polarity through the Par polarity complex [36]. Each of these functional associations of GIV earned it the title of ‘polarity scaffold protein’ and have been implicated in the generation of cell polarity.

By demonstrating that GIV is a direct target and an effector of the energy sensing kinase AMPK, Aznar et al. [34], defined the stress polarity pathway at a greater resolution, nearly a decade after the discovery of the pathway. They showed that energetic stress triggers localized activation of AMPK at the tricellular TJs, which mark the most vulnerable cell-cell contacts in sheets of polarized cells. Activation of AMPK triggers phosphorylation at a single site within GIV, i.e., Ser(S)245. When phosphorylated by AMPK, pS245-GIV preferentially localizes to the bicellular and tricellular TJs. Such localization is seen exclusively during TJ turnover, i.e., localization is seen both during TJ assembly as cells come in contact to form a monolayer and during TJ-disassembly as monolayers collapse in response to energetic stress or Ca²⁺-depletion. Their findings also led to the conclusion that phosphorylation on GIV S245 is a key determinant of normal epithelial morphogenesis-- phosphorylation favors polarized normal cysts, whereas absence of phosphorylation favors branching tubules and multi-lumen structures that are associated with loss of cell polarity. Finally, they showed that pS245-GIV, which is generated only when the AMPK-GIV axis is intact, is both necessary and sufficient to fortify TJs, avoid junctional collapse and preserve cell polarity in the face of energetic stress, all in a Ca²⁺-independent manner. They further concluded that a significant part of the junction-stabilizing effects of AMPK agonists AICAR and Metformin during energetic stress [6,7] are mediated by AMPK via its downstream effector, pS245-GIV. In demonstrating these, the authors revealed an elusive link between the stress-sensing components and the cell polarity pathways, and shed light onto how epithelial monolayers are protected despite being constantly bombarded by energetic stressors by fortifying cell-cell junctions against stress-induced collapse.

Mechanistically, they showed that pS245-GIV localizes to the TJ-associated microtubule tracks; 3D reconstruction of deconvolved confocal images revealed that pS245-GIV colocalized with and followed the bundles of polymerized microtubule tracks at the cell-cell borders, raising the possibility that the phosphoevent may impact GIV's ability to bind α- and/or β-tubulin heterodimers. Such localization appears to be facilitated by a direct interaction between the N-terminus of GIV (exclusively when phosphorylated at S245) and the short (~100 aa) C-terminus of α-tubulin; the latter is known to project as helices from polymerized MT tracks [40,41]. Once localized to the TJs, GIV may subsequently impact cell polarity and junctional integrity by assembling various aforementioned functional complexes with its C-terminus. Because AMPK regulates acetylation of the C-terminus of α-Tubulin during energetic stress [42] and because it is capable of stimulating microtubule polymerization at the cell periphery via phosphorylation of the microtubule plus-end protein, CLIP-170 [43], it is possible that either or both of these phenomena contribute to restricting the distribution of pS245-GIV exclusively at or near the junction-associated microtubule tracks.

It is also noteworthy that GIV’s C-terminus (which binds Par complexes, G protein, and cadherin-catenin complexes), its N-terminally located AMPK substrate site, and α-tubulin-binding domain are highly conserved across all mammals and in birds; however, GIV lacks a consensus AMPK site in drosophila, and its C-terminus is poorly conserved in fish. These observations are consistent with others’ observation that the LKB1/AMPK stress polarity pathway is not evolutionarily conserved; it is not required for the maintenance of polarity during energetic stress in either flies [44,45] or fish [46,47] [no evidence exists in amphibians, reptiles, or birds], instead, the pathway is evolutionarily young, raising the possibility that it may have co-evolved with GIV to meet the metabolic demands of endotherms (birds and mammals).

Pathophysiologic implications of the AMPK-GIV stress signaling pathway

Barrier (dys)function: Although the stress polarity pathway was originally demonstrated in polarized epithelial cells, studies using the AMPK activator, Metformin have demonstrated that AMPK fortifies cell-cell junctions in both epithelial [19,24,25,31] and in endothelial cells such as those lining the lung alveoli [48], blood vessels [21] and the blood-brain barrier [22,23,49,50] in the setting of stressors such as ischemia or sepsis (see Figure 1). Because GIV is ubiquitously expressed junctional scaffold, in both epithelial [36] and endothelial cells [39], it is possible that the stress-triggered mechanisms outlined by Aznar et al. [34], enable the barrier-protective role of AMPK at TJs observed in a diverse organs and tissues, both epithelial and endothelial linings, when challenged with chemical, bacterial and metabolic stressors (Figure 1).

Among the different body cavity linings (barriers), the mucosal barrier where the stress polarity pathway may be of greatest relevance is the intestinal mucosa. This barrier represents a huge mucosal surface, which separates billions of bacteria from the largest immune system of the body. On the one hand, the TJs of an intact intestinal barrier protect us against potential barrier disruptors, e.g., hypoperfusion of the gut, microorganisms and toxins, over-dosed nutrients [high fat], drugs, and other elements of lifestyle. On the other hand, this barrier must be open to absorb essential fluids and nutrients. Over the years, the beneficial [protective] effect of multiple nutritional components, dietary supplements, and pharmacologic agents, including the widely-prescribed AMPK-activator, Metformin on intestinal permeability in health and disease has been investigated; all studies converge on AMPK activation as a common pre-requisite for rendering such protection (see Figure 1). These studies raise the possibility that the AMPK-GIV stress polarity pathway defined by Aznar et al., may affect a variety of diseases that are associated with increased intestinal permeability (reviewed in [51]) such as critical illness, inflammatory bowel diseases [52,53], celiac disease, food allergy, irritable bowel syndrome [54,55], Alzheimer’s [56], Parkinson’s [57], multiple sclerosis [58-60], autism [61,62], chronic heart failure [63-65], aging (expanded below) and obesity and metabolic diseases (expanded below). All these diseases are characterized by systemic inflammation due to chronic endotoxemia that might be triggered by the translocation of endotoxins from the gut lumen into the host circulation.

Cancers: Previous work has shown that polarity defects precede the onset of tumorigenesis when the LKB1-AMPK pathway is inhibited [demonstrated in mice lacking the tumor suppressor and AMPK activating kinase, LKB1 [18];]. These findings had fueled speculation that polarity defects may be one of the major mechanisms for tumor initiation when the energy sensing pathway is dysregulated [66]. Aznar et al. [34], showed that the AMPK-GIV stress-polarity pathway inhibits oncogenic transformation and growth, and that disruption of this pathway (accomplished via mutations identified during genomic sequencing of colorectal cancers) helps tumor cells escape such inhibition and gain proliferative advantage during 3D growth (Figure 2). Because LKB1 is a master kinase that can activate all 13 members of the AMPK kinase family [67], and given the overlapping substrate specificity of AMPK and its related kinases (reviewed in [33]), it seems likely that AMPK-related family members, such as MARK/Par1, may phosphorylate S245 on GIV under specific conditions and in certain cancers. For example, in the case of gastric cancers, where elevated GIV expression carries poor prognosis [68], junctional/polarity defects are often observed. In this cancer, the carcinopathogen H. pylori drives cell transformation by delivering its virulence factor CagA (cytotoxin-associated gene A) into gastric epithelial cells through a bacterial type IV secretion system [69]. Upon entering the epithelial cells, CagA specifically binds and inhibits MARK/Par1 polarity kinase, triggering junctional and polarity defects [70]. It is tempting to speculate that MARK/Par1 may phosphorylate GIV at S245, and that inhibition of MARK/Par1 by CagA could deregulate the MARK-GIV signaling axis, thereby heralding neoplastic transformation. Future studies are planned to investigate if such is the case.

Figure 2. Graphical abstract summarizing how AMP-activated protein kinase fortifies epithelial tight junctions during energetic stress via its effector GIV/Girdin. Schematic showing the pertinent findings reported in by Aznar et al. [34]. Top (from left to right): In normal physiologic states, sheets of polarized epithelial cells maintain barrier integrity by assembling tight junctions [TJs; stained here with the TJ-marker and integral membrane protein, Occludin in green]. Exposure to energetic stress triggers the activation of AMPK, a sensor of cellular energy stores, which in turn phosphorylates GIV at Ser245. Phospho-GIV [stained red] localizes to the TJs [marked with occluding] and serves to stabilize TJs and resist stress-induced collapse. Bottom: Schematic summarizing how the AMPK-GIV signaling axis preserves TJ integrity via multiple interacting partners of the polarity scaffold, GIV, and how this stress-polarity pathway enhances barrier functions and inhibits neoplastic transformation.

Obesity, metabolic syndrome and type II Diabetes: Accumulating evidence shows that gut barrier dysfunction can influence whole-body metabolism [71,72] by affecting the energy balance [71], gut permeability [73,74], metabolic endotoxemia [75] and inflammation [72,73,75,76] that are associated with obesity and the spectrum of disorders associated with metabolic syndrome [25,77,78]. Numerous studies using the AMPK-activator, Metformin, squarely implicate the AMPK-dependent stress polarity pathway as a major therapeutic target in these metabolic disorders [79-81]. Metformin administration enhances gut barrier integrity, attenuates endotoxemia and enhances insulin signaling in high-fat fed mice, which accounts for the beneficial effects of metformin on glucose metabolism, enhanced metabolic insulin response, and reduced oxidative stress in liver and muscle of the mice [79]. Clinical trials using a delayed release formulation of Metformin (Metformin DR, which is designed to target the lower bowel and limit absorption into the blood) have shown that metformin works largely in the colon; despite the reduced levels of absorption of Metformin DR, this formulation was effective in lowering blood glucose [81]. Metformin treatment directly impacts the colonic mucosa and the gut microbiome [26]; the number of goblet cells and mucin production increases, senescence is reduced, and Akkermansia muciniphila, which is a mucin-degrading bacterium that resides in the mucus layer becomes abundant. Others have demonstrated that the presence of this bacterium directly correlates with gut barrier integrity [80,82] and inversely correlates with body weight and visceral adiposity in rodents and humans [80]. These studies have challenged the conventional thinking and the importance of the gut barrier as the primary defect in metabolic diseases has gained traction [83-85]. These studies also highlight the effectiveness of activation of AMPK as a therapeutic strategy to reinforce the gut barrier and correct metabolic disorders.

Aging: Aging is characterized by the functional decline of individual organ systems of an organism, and progressively increases the probability of death. Among the various organ systems that decline during aging, dysfunction of the intestinal barrier has been correlated with increasing age in a variety of species. For example, dysfunction of the intestinal barrier predicts impending death in individual flies regardless of the chronological age [86]. Much like humans, these flies show an age-related increase in immunity-related gene expression (e.g., IL6) accompanies such dysregulation of barrier [86]. Evidence also shows that intestinal barrier dysfunction during aging is conserved in worms (C. elegans) and fish (D. rerio) [87,88], and in mammals (rats [89] and baboons [90];), thus raising the possibility that it may also be the case in humans. However, studies in humans have shown that intestinal permeability is not increased simply due to aging, but increases in the setting of coexisting stressors such as low-grade inflammation and/or type II diabetes [91].

As for the mechanism of increased permeability, colonic biopsies from aging baboons showed that increased permeability is associated with age-associated remodeling of epithelial TJs [decreased zonula occluden-1, occludin, and junctional adhesion molecule-A tight junction protein expression and increased claudin-2 expression; the latter promotes the formation of pores that allow the paracellular movement of cations and small molecules and increases permeability] [90]. In fact, several important physiological processes that are dependent on TJ integrity and cell polarity are altered during aging, involving both epithelial and endothelial cells (reviewed in [92]). It is possible that the observed anti-ageing properties of Metformin (via multiple widely pleiotropic effects reviewed in [93]), as in the case of obesity and diabetes, may begin by preserving the gut barrier function, thereby reducing age-related inflammation and metabolic derangements. If so, Metformin is expected to act via the AMPK-GIV stress polarity pathway to resist aging related increase in gut permeability. Ongoing clinical trials approved by the FDA (such as Targeting Ageing with Metformin; TAME) are likely to provide the best opportunity to investigate these possibilities.

Mechanism of action of the wonder drug, Metformin: For almost a century, ever since the biosynthesis of the xenobiotic metformin by Emil Werner and James Bell in 1922, scientists have been revisiting the mechanism of action of this first-line treatment for type II diabetes. Metformin (Glucophage) is now the most widely prescribed type II diabetes drug in the world; it reduces blood glucose by activating the LKB1-AMPK pathway [94] and inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis (reviewed in [33]). Besides its ability to lower blood glucose, Metformin also exerts two other effects in an AMPK-dependent manner: (i) it stabilizes cell-cell junctions and protects barrier functions of both epithelial and endothelial monolayers in the setting of a variety of pathologic stressors; and (ii) it suppresses the growth of a variety of tumor cells and embryonic stem cells in culture and tumor xenografts in mice (reviewed in [33). By demonstrating that phosphorylation of GIV by AMPK is required for Metformin to exert both these effects efficiently, Aznar et al. [34], implicated the AMPK-GIV signaling axis as an important mechanism of action of Metformin. It is noteworthy that although multiple retrospective clinical trials have generally concluded that prolonged use of Metformin reduces the incidence of cancer, others have reported conflicting results, and several prospective clinical trials are underway to identify which target populations may specifically benefit from this drug (reviewed in [95,96]). Given the widespread long-term use of metformin as a prescription drug and its potential utility both in chemoprevention as well as chemotherapy, further studies are warranted to investigate if the GIV-expression status in tumors (e.g., its expression as a spliced isoform lacking the C-terminus [97] or mutants that prevent phosphorylation by AMPK [34], or its overexpression as full length [98]) may help identify which patients may benefit from the tumor suppressive actions of the Metformin.

In conclusion, just when investigations on the phenomenon of stress polarity pathway had hit a cold trail, findings reported by Aznar et al. have reopened the topic by netting a strong set of clues (GIV) and have raised many more important questions. Also remains unknown how the interplay between the newly discovered AMPK→GIV signaling axis with multiple other inputs and outputs within the AMPK energy-sensing pathway (reviewed in [99,100]), with the plethora of interactions within the expanding AMPK interactome [101], with newly emerging substrates within new pathways, e.g., neucleosome modeling [102], the glycolytic pathway [103], mitochondrial dynamics [104], junctional scaffolds, like cingulin [105], regulators of microtubule dynamics, like CLIP 170 [43]. Future studies are warranted to seek answers to these questions so that the pathophysiologic implications of this pathway and its potential as therapeutic target in a plethora of chronic diseases can be fully realized.

Conflicts of Interest

The author has no conflict of interests to declare.

Funding

This work was funded by NIH (R01CA160911, R01CA100768 and DK099226) to P.G.

References

• 1. Kaplan NA, Liu X, Tolwinski NS. Epithelial polarity: interactions between junctions and apical-basal machinery. Genetics. 2009; 183:897–904. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.108878 [PubMed]
• 2. Martin-Belmonte F, Perez-Moreno M. Epithelial cell polarity, stem cells and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011; 12:23–38. [PubMed]
• 3. St Johnston D, Sanson B. Epithelial polarity and morphogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011; 23:540–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2011.07.005 [PubMed]
• 4. Wodarz A, Näthke I. Cell polarity in development and cancer. Nat Cell Biol. 2007; 9:1016–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb433 [PubMed]
• 5. St Johnston D, Ahringer J. Cell polarity in eggs and epithelia: parallels and diversity. Cell. 2010; 141:757–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.011 [PubMed]
• 6. Zheng B, Cantley LC. Regulation of epithelial tight junction assembly and disassembly by AMP-activated protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104:819–22. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610157104 [PubMed]
• 7. Zhang L, Li J, Young LH, Caplan MJ. AMP-activated protein kinase regulates the assembly of epithelial tight junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103:17272–77. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608531103 [PubMed]
• 8. Lee JH, Koh H, Kim M, Kim Y, Lee SY, Karess RE, Lee SH, Shong M, Kim JM, Kim J, Chung J. Energy-dependent regulation of cell structure by AMP-activated protein kinase. Nature. 2007; 447:1017–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05828 [PubMed]
• 9. Easom RA, Zammit VA. Diurnal changes in the fraction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase in the active form in rat liver microsomal fractions. Biochem J. 1984; 220:739–45. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2200739 [PubMed]
• 10. Easom RA, Zammit VA. A cold-clamping technique for the rapid sampling of rat liver for studies on enzymes in separate cell fractions. Suitability for the study of enzymes regulated by reversible phosphorylation-dephosphorylation. Biochem J. 1984; 220:733–38. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2200733 [PubMed]
• 11. Harwood HJJr, Brandt KG, Rodwell VW. Allosteric activation of rat liver cytosolic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase kinase by nucleoside diphosphates. J Biol Chem. 1984; 259:2810–15. [PubMed]
• 12. Ferrer A, Caelles C, Massot N, Hegardt FG. Activation of rat liver cytosolic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase kinase by adenosine 5′-monophosphate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1985; 132:497–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(85)91161-1 [PubMed]
• 13. Munday MR, Campbell DG, Carling D, Hardie DG. Identification by amino acid sequencing of three major regulatory phosphorylation sites on rat acetyl-CoA carboxylase. Eur J Biochem. 1988; 175:331–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14201.x [PubMed]
• 14. Hong SP, Leiper FC, Woods A, Carling D, Carlson M. Activation of yeast Snf1 and mammalian AMP-activated protein kinase by upstream kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100:8839–43. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1533136100 [PubMed]
• 15. Hawley SA, Boudeau J, Reid JL, Mustard KJ, Udd L, Mäkelä TP, Alessi DR, Hardie DG. Complexes between the LKB1 tumor suppressor, STRAD alpha/beta and MO25 alpha/beta are upstream kinases in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. J Biol. 2003; 2:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-4924-2-28 [PubMed]
• 16. Woods A, Johnstone SR, Dickerson K, Leiper FC, Fryer LG, Neumann D, Schlattner U, Wallimann T, Carlson M, Carling D. LKB1 is the upstream kinase in the AMP-activated protein kinase cascade. Curr Biol. 2003; 13:2004–08. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.031 [PubMed]
• 17. Shaw RJ, Kosmatka M, Bardeesy N, Hurley RL, Witters LA, DePinho RA, Cantley LC. The tumor suppressor LKB1 kinase directly activates AMP-activated kinase and regulates apoptosis in response to energy stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101:3329–35. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308061100 [PubMed]
• 18. Hezel AF, Gurumurthy S, Granot Z, Swisa A, Chu GC, Bailey G, Dor Y, Bardeesy N, Depinho RA. Pancreatic LKB1 deletion leads to acinar polarity defects and cystic neoplasms. Mol Cell Biol. 2008; 28:2414–25. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01621-07 [PubMed]
• 19. Garnett JP, Baker EH, Naik S, Lindsay JA, Knight GM, Gill S, Tregoning JS, Baines DL. Metformin reduces airway glucose permeability and hyperglycaemia-induced Staphylococcus aureus load independently of effects on blood glucose. Thorax. 2013; 68:835–45. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-203178 [PubMed]
• 20. Tang XX, Chen H, Yu S, Zhang L, Caplan MJ, Chan HC. Lymphocytes accelerate epithelial tight junction assembly: role of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). PLoS One. 2010; 5:e12343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012343 [PubMed]
• 21. Castanares-Zapatero D, Bouleti C, Sommereyns C, Gerber B, Lecut C, Mathivet T, Horckmans M, Communi D, Foretz M, Vanoverschelde JL, Germain S, Bertrand L, Laterre PF, et al. Connection between cardiac vascular permeability, myocardial edema, and inflammation during sepsis: role of the α1AMP-activated protein kinase isoform. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41:e411–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829866dc [PubMed]
• 22. Takata F, Dohgu S, Matsumoto J, Machida T, Kaneshima S, Matsuo M, Sakaguchi S, Takeshige Y, Yamauchi A, Kataoka Y. Metformin induces up-regulation of blood-brain barrier functions by activating AMP-activated protein kinase in rat brain microvascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013; 433:586–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.03.036 [PubMed]
• 23. Liu Y, Tang G, Li Y, Wang Y, Chen X, Gu X, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Yang GY. Metformin attenuates blood-brain barrier disruption in mice following middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Neuroinflammation. 2014; 11:177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-014-0177-4 [PubMed]
• 24. Seo-Mayer PW, Thulin G, Zhang L, Alves DS, Ardito T, Kashgarian M, Caplan MJ. Preactivation of AMPK by metformin may ameliorate the epithelial cell damage caused by renal ischemia. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011; 301:F1346–57. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00420.2010 [PubMed]
• 25. Spruss A, Kanuri G, Stahl C, Bischoff SC, Bergheim I. Metformin protects against the development of fructose-induced steatosis in mice: role of the intestinal barrier function. Lab Invest. 2012; 92:1020–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.2012.75 [PubMed]
• 26. Shin NR, Lee JC, Lee HY, Kim MS, Whon TW, Lee MS, Bae JW. An increase in the Akkermansia spp. population induced by metformin treatment improves glucose homeostasis in diet-induced obese mice. Gut. 2014; 63:727–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303839 [PubMed]
• 27. Peng L, Li ZR, Green RS, Holzman IR, Lin J. Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J Nutr. 2009; 139:1619–25. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.104638 [PubMed]
• 28. Wang B, Wu Z, Ji Y, Sun K, Dai Z, Wu G. L-Glutamine Enhances Tight Junction Integrity by Activating CaMK Kinase 2-AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling in Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cells. J Nutr. 2016; 146:501–08. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.115.224857 [PubMed]
• 29. Park HY, Kunitake Y, Hirasaki N, Tanaka M, Matsui T. Theaflavins enhance intestinal barrier of Caco-2 Cell monolayers through the expression of AMP-activated protein kinase-mediated Occludin, Claudin-1, and ZO-1. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2015; 79:130–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09168451.2014.951027 [PubMed]
• 30. Yan XP, Wang S, Yang Y, Qiu YD. Effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on rat livers after partial hepatectomy via LKB1-AMPK signaling pathway. Transplant Proc. 2011; 43:3604–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.10.045 [PubMed]
• 31. Patkee WR, Carr G, Baker EH, Baines DL, Garnett JP. Metformin prevents the effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on airway epithelial tight junctions and restricts hyperglycaemia-induced bacterial growth. J Cell Mol Med. 2016; 20:758–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12784 [PubMed]
• 32. Zhang L, Jouret F, Rinehart J, Sfakianos J, Mellman I, Lifton RP, Young LH, Caplan MJ. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) inhibition induce Ca2+-independent deposition of tight junction components at the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286:16879–90. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.186932 [PubMed]
• 33. Shackelford DB, Shaw RJ. The LKB1-AMPK pathway: metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009; 9:563–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2676 [PubMed]
• 34. Aznar N, Patel A, Rohena CC, Dunkel Y, Joosen LP, Taupin V, Kufareva I, Farquhar MG, Ghosh P. AMP-activated protein kinase fortifies epithelial tight junctions during energetic stress via its effector GIV/Girdin. eLife. 2016; 5:5. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20795 [PubMed]
• 35. Bhandari D, Lopez-Sanchez I, To A, Lo IC, Aznar N, Leyme A, Gupta V, Niesman I, Maddox AL, Garcia-Marcos M, Farquhar MG, Ghosh P. Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activates guanine nucleotide exchange factor GIV/Girdin to orchestrate migration-proliferation dichotomy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112:E4874–83. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514157112 [PubMed]
• 36. Sasaki K, Kakuwa T, Akimoto K, Koga H, Ohno S. Regulation of epithelial cell polarity by PAR-3 depends on Girdin transcription and Girdin-Gαi3 signaling. J Cell Sci. 2015; 128:2244–58. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.160879 [PubMed]
• 37. Houssin E, Tepass U, Laprise P. Girdin-mediated interactions between cadherin and the actin cytoskeleton are required for epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila. Development. 2015; 142:1777–84. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.122002 [PubMed]
• 38. Ohara K, Enomoto A, Kato T, Hashimoto T, Isotani-Sakakibara M, Asai N, Ishida-Takagishi M, Weng L, Nakayama M, Watanabe T, Kato K, Kaibuchi K, Murakumo Y, et al. Involvement of Girdin in the determination of cell polarity during cell migration. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e36681. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036681 [PubMed]
• 39. Ichimiya H, Maeda K, Enomoto A, Weng L, Takahashi M, Murohara T. Girdin/GIV regulates transendothelial permeability by controlling VE-cadherin trafficking through the small GTPase, R-Ras. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015; 461:260–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.04.012 [PubMed]
• 40. Nogales E, Wolf SG, Downing KH. Structure of the alpha beta tubulin dimer by electron crystallography. Nature. 1998; 391:199–203. https://doi.org/10.1038/34465 [PubMed]
• 41. Nogales E, Whittaker M, Milligan RA, Downing KH. High-resolution model of the microtubule. Cell. 1999; 96:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80961-7 [PubMed]
• 42. Herms A, Bosch M, Reddy BJ, Schieber NL, Fajardo A, Rupérez C, Fernández-Vidal A, Ferguson C, Rentero C, Tebar F, Enrich C, Parton RG, Gross SP, Pol A. AMPK activation promotes lipid droplet dispersion on detyrosinated microtubules to increase mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:7176. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8176 [PubMed]
• 43. Nakano A, Kato H, Watanabe T, Min KD, Yamazaki S, Asano Y, Seguchi O, Higo S, Shintani Y, Asanuma H, Asakura M, Minamino T, Kaibuchi K, et al. AMPK controls the speed of microtubule polymerization and directional cell migration through CLIP-170 phosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol. 2010; 12:583–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2060 [PubMed]
• 44. Mirouse V, Swick LL, Kazgan N, Johnston DS, Brenman JE. LKB1 and AMPK maintain epithelial cell polarity under energetic stress. J Cell Biol. 2013; 203:373. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.20070205310112013r [PubMed]
• 45. Haack T, Bergstralh DT, St Johnston D. Damage to the Drosophila follicle cell epithelium produces “false clones” with apparent polarity phenotypes. Biol Open. 2013; 2:1313–20. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.20134671 [PubMed]
• 46. van der Velden YU, Haramis AP. Insights from model organisms on the functions of the tumor suppressor protein LKB1: zebrafish chips in. Aging (Albany NY). 2011; 3:363–67. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.100319 [PubMed]
• 47. van der Velden YU, Wang L, Zevenhoven J, van Rooijen E, van Lohuizen M, Giles RH, Clevers H, Haramis AP. The serine-threonine kinase LKB1 is essential for survival under energetic stress in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108:4358–63. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010210108 [PubMed]
• 48. Jian MY, Alexeyev MF, Wolkowicz PE, Zmijewski JW, Creighton JR. Metformin-stimulated AMPK-α1 promotes microvascular repair in acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2013; 305:L844–55. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00173.2013 [PubMed]
• 49. Farbood Y, Sarkaki A, Khalaj L, Khodagholi F, Badavi M, Ashabi G. Targeting Adenosine Monophosphate-Activated Protein Kinase by Metformin Adjusts Post-Ischemic Hyperemia and Extracellular Neuronal Discharge in Transient Global Cerebral Ischemia. Microcirculation. 2015; 22:534–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12224 [PubMed]
• 50. Zhao B, Wang X, Zheng J, Wang H, Liu J. Effects of metformin treatment on glioma-induced brain edema. Am J Transl Res. 2016; 8:3351–63. [PubMed]
• 51. Bischoff SC, Barbara G, Buurman W, Ockhuizen T, Schulzke JD, Serino M, Tilg H, Watson A, Wells JM. Intestinal permeability--a new target for disease prevention and therapy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014; 14:189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0189-7 [PubMed]
• 52. Lee SY, Lee SH, Yang EJ, Kim EK, Kim JK, Shin DY, Cho ML. Metformin Ameliorates Inflammatory Bowel Disease by Suppression of the STAT3 Signaling Pathway and Regulation of the between Th17/Treg Balance. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0135858. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135858 [PubMed]
• 53. Xue Y, Zhang H, Sun X, Zhu MJ. Metformin Improves Ileal Epithelial Barrier Function in Interleukin-10 Deficient Mice. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0168670. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168670 [PubMed]
• 54. Barbara G. Mucosal barrier defects in irritable bowel syndrome. Who left the door open? Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101:1295–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00667.x [PubMed]
• 55. Camilleri M, Gorman H. Intestinal permeability and irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2007; 19:545–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.00925.x [PubMed]
• 56. Alam MZ, Alam Q, Kamal MA, Abuzenadah AM, Haque A. A possible link of gut microbiota alteration in type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease pathogenicity: an update. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2014; 13:383–90. https://doi.org/10.2174/18715273113126660151 [PubMed]
• 57. Clairembault T, Leclair-Visonneau L, Coron E, Bourreille A, Le Dily S, Vavasseur F, Heymann MF, Neunlist M, Derkinderen P. Structural alterations of the intestinal epithelial barrier in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015; 3:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-015-0196-0 [PubMed]
• 58. Buscarinu MC, Cerasoli B, Annibali V, Policano C, Lionetto L, Capi M, Mechelli R, Romano S, Fornasiero A, Mattei G, Piras E, Angelini DF, Battisitni L, et al. Altered intestinal permeability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. Mult Scler. 20161352458516652498. [PubMed]
• 59. Nouri M, Bredberg A, Weström B, Lavasani S. Intestinal barrier dysfunction develops at the onset of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, and can be induced by adoptive transfer of auto-reactive T cells. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e106335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106335 [PubMed]
• 60. Yacyshyn B, Meddings J, Sadowski D, Bowen-Yacyshyn MB. Multiple sclerosis patients have peripheral blood CD45RO+ B cells and increased intestinal permeability. Dig Dis Sci. 1996; 41:2493–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02100148 [PubMed]
• 61. Samsam M, Ahangari R, Naser SA. Pathophysiology of autism spectrum disorders: revisiting gastrointestinal involvement and immune imbalance. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:9942–51. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9942 [PubMed]
• 62. van De Sande MM, van Buul VJ, Brouns FJ. Autism and nutrition: the role of the gut-brain axis. Nutr Res Rev. 2014; 27:199–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422414000110 [PubMed]
• 63. Sandek A, Bjarnason I, Volk HD, Crane R, Meddings JB, Niebauer J, Kalra PR, Buhner S, Herrmann R, Springer J, Doehner W, von Haehling S, Anker SD, Rauchhaus M. Studies on bacterial endotoxin and intestinal absorption function in patients with chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2012; 157:80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.016 [PubMed]
• 64. Sandek A, Rauchhaus M, Anker SD, von Haehling S. The emerging role of the gut in chronic heart failure. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2008; 11:632–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e32830a4c6e [PubMed]
• 65. Sandek A, Bauditz J, Swidsinski A, Buhner S, Weber-Eibel J, von Haehling S, Schroedl W, Karhausen T, Doehner W, Rauchhaus M, Poole-Wilson P, Volk HD, Lochs H, Anker SD. Altered intestinal function in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50:1561–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.016 [PubMed]
• 66. Hezel AF, Bardeesy N. LKB1; linking cell structure and tumor suppression. Oncogene. 2008; 27:6908–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.342 [PubMed]
• 67. Lizcano JM, Göransson O, Toth R, Deak M, Morrice NA, Boudeau J, Hawley SA, Udd L, Mäkelä TP, Hardie DG, Alessi DR. LKB1 is a master kinase that activates 13 kinases of the AMPK subfamily, including MARK/PAR-1. EMBO J. 2004; 23:833–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600110 [PubMed]
• 68. Wang C, Lin J, Li L, Wang Y. Expression and clinical significance of girdin in gastric cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2014; 2:425–28. [PubMed]
• 69. Hatakeyama M. Helicobacter pylori CagA and gastric cancer: a paradigm for hit-and-run carcinogenesis. Cell Host Microbe. 2014; 15:306–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.008 [PubMed]
• 70. Hatakeyama M. Linking epithelial polarity and carcinogenesis by multitasking Helicobacter pylori virulence factor CagA. Oncogene. 2008; 27:7047–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.353 [PubMed]
• 71. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006; 444:1027–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05414 [PubMed]
• 72. Cani PD, Osto M, Geurts L, Everard A. Involvement of gut microbiota in the development of low-grade inflammation and type 2 diabetes associated with obesity. Gut Microbes. 2012; 3:279–88. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.19625 [PubMed]
• 73. Cani PD, Possemiers S, Van de Wiele T, Guiot Y, Everard A, Rottier O, Geurts L, Naslain D, Neyrinck A, Lambert DM, Muccioli GG, Delzenne NM. Changes in gut microbiota control inflammation in obese mice through a mechanism involving GLP-2-driven improvement of gut permeability. Gut. 2009; 58:1091–103. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.165886 [PubMed]
• 74. Muccioli GG, Naslain D, Bäckhed F, Reigstad CS, Lambert DM, Delzenne NM, Cani PD. The endocannabinoid system links gut microbiota to adipogenesis. Mol Syst Biol. 2010; 6:392. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.46 [PubMed]
• 75. Cani PD, Amar J, Iglesias MA, Poggi M, Knauf C, Bastelica D, Neyrinck AM, Fava F, Tuohy KM, Chabo C, Waget A, Delmée E, Cousin B, et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2007; 56:1761–72. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-1491 [PubMed]
• 76. Cani PD, Delzenne NM, Amar J, Burcelin R. Role of gut microflora in the development of obesity and insulin resistance following high-fat diet feeding. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2008; 56:305–09. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patbio.2007.09.008 [PubMed]
• 77. Escobedo G, López-Ortiz E, Torres-Castro I. Gut microbiota as a key player in triggering obesity, systemic inflammation and insulin resistance. Rev Invest Clin. 2014; 66:450–59. [PubMed]
• 78. Gummesson A, Carlsson LM, Storlien LH, Bäckhed F, Lundin P, Löfgren L, Stenlöf K, Lam YY, Fagerberg B, Carlsson B. Intestinal permeability is associated with visceral adiposity in healthy women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011; 19:2280–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2011.251 [PubMed]
• 79. Zhou ZY, Ren LW, Zhan P, Yang HY, Chai DD, Yu ZW. Metformin exerts glucose-lowering action in high-fat fed mice via attenuating endotoxemia and enhancing insulin signaling. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2016; 37:1063–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2016.21 [PubMed]
• 80. Everard A, Belzer C, Geurts L, Ouwerkerk JP, Druart C, Bindels LB, Guiot Y, Derrien M, Muccioli GG, Delzenne NM, de Vos WM, Cani PD. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110:9066–71. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219451110 [PubMed]
• 81. Buse JB, DeFronzo RA, Rosenstock J, Kim T, Burns C, Skare S, Baron A, Fineman M. The Primary Glucose-Lowering Effect of Metformin Resides in the Gut, Not the Circulation: Results From Short-term Pharmacokinetic and 12-Week Dose-Ranging Studies. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39:198–205. [PubMed]
• 82. Li J, Lin S, Vanhoutte PM, Woo CW, Xu A. Akkermansia Muciniphila Protects Against Atherosclerosis by Preventing Metabolic Endotoxemia-Induced Inflammation in Apoe-/- Mice. Circulation. 2016; 133:2434–46. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019645 [PubMed]
• 83. Wu T, Horowitz M, Rayner CK. New insights into the anti-diabetic actions of metformin: from the liver to the gut. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 1–10. [PubMed]
• 84. Bauer PV, Duca FA. Targeting the gastrointestinal tract to treat type 2 diabetes. J Endocrinol. 2016; 230:R95–113. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-16-0056 [PubMed]
• 85. McCreight LJ, Bailey CJ, Pearson ER. Metformin and the gastrointestinal tract. Diabetologia. 2016; 59:426–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3844-9 [PubMed]
• 86. Rera M, Clark RI, Walker DW. Intestinal barrier dysfunction links metabolic and inflammatory markers of aging to death in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109:21528–33. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215849110 [PubMed]
• 87. Dambroise E, Monnier L, Ruisheng L, Aguilaniu H, Joly JS, Tricoire H, Rera M. Two phases of aging separated by the Smurf transition as a public path to death. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:23523. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23523 [PubMed]
• 88. Tricoire H, Rera M. A New, Discontinuous 2 Phases of Aging Model: lessons from Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0141920. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141920 [PubMed]
• 89. Katz D, Hollander D, Said HM, Dadufalza V. Aging-associated increase in intestinal permeability to polyethylene glycol 900. Dig Dis Sci. 1987; 32:285–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01297055 [PubMed]
• 90. Tran L, Greenwood-Van Meerveld B. Age-associated remodeling of the intestinal epithelial barrier. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013; 68:1045–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glt106 [PubMed]
• 91. Valentini L, Ramminger S, Haas V, Postrach E, Werich M, Fischer A, Koller M, Swidsinski A, Bereswill S, Lochs H, Schulzke JD. Small intestinal permeability in older adults. Physiol Rep. 2014; 2:e00281. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.281 [PubMed]
• 92. Soares H, Marinho HS, Real C, Antunes F. Cellular polarity in aging: role of redox regulation and nutrition. Genes Nutr. 2014; 9:371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-013-0371-5 [PubMed]
• 93. Barzilai N, Crandall JP, Kritchevsky SB, Espeland MA. Metformin as a Tool to Target Aging. Cell Metab. 2016; 23:1060–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.011 [PubMed]
• 94. Shaw RJ, Lamia KA, Vasquez D, Koo SH, Bardeesy N, Depinho RA, Montminy M, Cantley LC. The kinase LKB1 mediates glucose homeostasis in liver and therapeutic effects of metformin. Science. 2005; 310:1642–46. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120781 [PubMed]
• 95. Pryor R, Cabreiro F. Repurposing metformin: an old drug with new tricks in its binding pockets. Biochem J. 2015; 471:307–22. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20150497 [PubMed]
• 96. Kourelis TV, Siegel RD. Metformin and cancer: new applications for an old drug. Med Oncol. 2012; 29:1314–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-011-9846-7 [PubMed]
• 97. Ghosh P, Beas AO, Bornheimer SJ, Garcia-Marcos M, Forry EP, Johannson C, Ear J, Jung BH, Cabrera B, Carethers JM, Farquhar MG. A Galphai-GIV molecular complex binds epidermal growth factor receptor and determines whether cells migrate or proliferate. Mol Biol Cell. 2010; 21:2338–54. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-01-0028 [PubMed]
• 98. Ghosh P, Tie J, Muranyi A, Singh S, Brunhoeber P, Leith K, Bowermaster R, Liao Z, Zhu Y, LaFleur B, Tran B, Desai J, Jones I, et al. Girdin (GIV) Expression as a Prognostic Marker of Recurrence in Mismatch Repair-Proficient Stage II Colon Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22:3488–98. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2290 [PubMed]
• 99. Ross FA, MacKintosh C, Hardie DG. AMP-activated protein kinase: a cellular energy sensor that comes in 12 flavours. FEBS J. 2016; 283:2987–3001. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13698 [PubMed]
• 100. Hardie DG, Schaffer BE, Brunet A. AMPK: An Energy-Sensing Pathway with Multiple Inputs and Outputs. Trends Cell Biol. 2016; 26:190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2015.10.013 [PubMed]
• 101. Moon S, Han D, Kim Y, Jin J, Ho WK, Kim Y. Interactome analysis of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-α1 and -β1 in INS-1 pancreatic beta-cells by affinity purification-mass spectrometry. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:4376. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04376 [PubMed]
• 102. Marin TL, Gongol B, Zhang F, Martin M, Johnson DA, Xiao H, Wang Y, Subramaniam S, Chien S, Shyy JY. AMPK promotes mitochondrial biogenesis and function by phosphorylating the epigenetic factors DNMT1, RBBP7, and HAT1. Sci Signal. 2017; 10:eaaf7478. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aaf7478 [PubMed]
• 103. Cantelmo AR, Conradi LC, Brajic A, Goveia J, Kalucka J, Pircher A, Chaturvedi P, Hol J, Thienpont B, Teuwen LA, Schoors S, Boeckx B, Vriens J, et al. Inhibition of the Glycolytic Activator PFKFB3 in Endothelium Induces Tumor Vessel Normalization, Impairs Metastasis, and Improves Chemotherapy. Cancer Cell. 2016; 30:968–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2016.10.006 [PubMed]
• 104. Ducommun S, Deak M, Sumpton D, Ford RJ, Núñez Galindo A, Kussmann M, Viollet B, Steinberg GR, Foretz M, Dayon L, Morrice NA, Sakamoto K. Motif affinity and mass spectrometry proteomic approach for the discovery of cellular AMPK targets: identification of mitochondrial fission factor as a new AMPK substrate. Cell Signal. 2015; 27:978–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.02.008 [PubMed]
• 105. Yano T, Matsui T, Tamura A, Uji M, Tsukita S. The association of microtubules with tight junctions is promoted by cingulin phosphorylation by AMPK. J Cell Biol. 2013; 203:605–14. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201304194 [PubMed]